Teams

PLEASANTON 18AM3.0B

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-11vs CROW CANYON CC 18AM3.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesBheemsen Aitha / Anish Vib vs Terry Church / Aaron Kaplan6-1, 6-2
2022-06-04vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesARMAND MADRID / Anish Vib vs Gautam Joshi / Narayana Rao Surapaneni2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKandarp Acharya / Anish Vib vs Rich DeGuzman / Steve Zalewski6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnanth Manjapra / Anish Vib vs Cliff Johnson / Peter Houston1-6, 1-6
2022-05-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChandrasekhar Iyer / Anish Vib vs Dattu Akella / Sreekanth Gannavarapu1-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs BLACKHAWK CC 18AM3.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesKandarp Acharya / Anish Vib vs Andy Lee / Kevin Reece4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
3.27
Dattu Akella
published 3.5
3.14
3.03
Anish Vib
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
2.97
Sachin Shetti
published
2.88
2.80
Jagadish Beeram
published 3
Ananth Manjapra
published 3
2.74
Bheemsen Aitha
published 3
2.66
Sampath Velupula
published
Sandeep Rohilla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dattu Akella + Venkata Sravan Nittala224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sreekanth Gannavarapu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Dattu Akella
53W–35L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Vamsikrishna Paladugu
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3
Anish Vib
37W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
3.5
Venkata Sravan Nittala
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Sachin Shetti
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Chandrasekhar Iyer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Jagadish Beeram
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ananth Manjapra
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Bheemsen Aitha
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Sampath Velupula
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Sandeep Rohilla
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vijay Kumar Jandhyala
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.