Teams

MHenninger (Raintree)

2024 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Mon PM

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-04vs AStover/RGrantham (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGreg Ladky / Emily Ladky vs Jami Stone / Kelly Stone1-6, 2-6
2024-07-22vs KMacrone (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Henninger / Lucinda Supernavage vs JJ Zhu / Jason Trapani6-3, 6-3
2024-07-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Henninger / Lucinda Supernavage vs Kim Bergin / Leo Liu1-6, 2-6
2024-07-01vs EEisenbaum (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Ladky / Greg Ladky vs Sharath Budipalli / Tania Inga0-6, 1-6
2024-05-20vs EEisenbaum (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Henninger / Lucinda Supernavage vs Jasmine Fontaine / Philip Myers2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Susan Chandler
published
2.77
Adriana Hall
published 3
2.71
Owen Williams
published
2.70
Greg Ladky
published 3
2.69
Mike Henninger
published
2.68
Andre Plaisance
published 3
2.54
Theresa Joiner
published
2.35
Anje Seufert
published 2.5
2.32
Emily Ladky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.26
Lucinda Supernavage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Rebecca Plaisance
published
2.07
Marcy Williams
published
Paula Abrams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Ladky + Emily Ladky0524% games−7.1% vs expected
Mike Henninger + Lucinda Supernavage1434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Chandler
35W–30L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Adriana Hall
16W–45L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Owen Williams
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Greg Ladky
1W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Mike Henninger
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Andre Plaisance
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Theresa Joiner
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Anje Seufert
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Emily Ladky
25W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Lucinda Supernavage
36W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.26
Rebecca Plaisance
11W–30L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Marcy Williams
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Paula Abrams
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.