Teams

Marcotte/FS/HO

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-23vs Mullens/VB/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Marcela Escobar vs Monique Bracken / Sharon Guzman6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesShirley Vega vs Madelyn Sturgill2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKatie Gibbs / Jacie Hamby vs Blanca Barroso / Wendy Mullens7-5, 6-4
2026-04-14vs Knoll/FS/CMWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Gibbs / Stacy Seeger vs Sara Carroll / Emily Knoll6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMarcela Escobar vs Dariela Guevara6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWhitney Marcotte / Erin Barker vs Michelle Greenfield / Candyce Gabucci6-0, 6-3
2026-04-09vs Mullens/VB/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Whitney Marcotte vs Wendy Mullens / Emma Robertson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJacie Hamby vs Madelyn Sturgill6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErin Barker / Kristey Taake vs Blanca Barroso / Madeline Jamison4-6, 5-7
2026-04-02vs Knoll/FS/CMWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Whitney Marcotte vs Michelle Greenfield / Mitzi Efurd6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristey Taake vs Sara Carroll6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKailyn Smith / Piper Seiter vs Camille Friday / Natalie Martin6-4, 6-2
2026-03-05vs Knoll/FS/CMWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcela Escobar / Shirley Vega vs Camille Friday / Taylor Oneal6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKailyn Smith vs Natalie Martin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPiper Seiter / Kristey Taake vs Sara Carroll / Michelle Greenfield6-3, 6-2
2026-02-25vs Mullens/VB/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacie Hamby / Katie Gibbs vs Blanca Barroso / Sharon Guzman6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEmily Humphrey vs Madelyn Sturgill6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesErin Barker / Stacy Seeger vs Emma Robertson / Wendy Mullens2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Katie Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Emily Humphrey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.49
Jacie Hamby
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.48
Shirley Vega
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.46
Marcela Escobar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.41
Kailyn Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.22
Piper Seiter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Kristey Taake
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.20
Stacy Seeger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.08
Whitney Marcotte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Erin Barker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcela Escobar + Jacie Hamby404 matchesnot enough data
Erin Barker + Kristey Taake123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Gibbs
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Emily Humphrey
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
Jacie Hamby
22W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Shirley Vega
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Marcela Escobar
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
Kailyn Smith
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Piper Seiter
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Kristey Taake
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Stacy Seeger
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Whitney Marcotte
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Erin Barker
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.