Teams

LKHaynes-Westport/CSD 18s

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Men 8.5 Wed pm

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-19vs LRCA-Caballero-NMPC8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChip Ashley / Andy Michael vs Otto Vejsada / Tim Bain0-6, 1-6
2022-10-05vs LSSree - NMP - 85Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJasen Fici / Kevin Hawkins vs Adam Colborne / Luke Laney1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-21vs LAKing/CSDLost 01
L#2 DoublesChip Ashley / Ron Barbagli vs Alex King / Christopher Gardner2-6, 3-6
2022-09-14vs LRCA-Caballero-NMPC8.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJasen Fici / Mike Noble vs Otto Vejsada / Aleksandr Lvovich2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChip Ashley / Ron Barbagli vs Rogers Warner / Ashok Kumar Kuppusamy6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-07vs LJEP-Epler/CSDWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Kayton / Chip Ashley vs Douglas Hausler / Todd Armstrong6-4, 7-5
2022-08-17vs LAKing/CSDLost 02
L#2 DoublesChip Ashley / Michael Dedmond vs Lance King / Corey Campbell4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Hawkins / Bret Masters vs Alex King / Evan Sutker7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 Wed pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Steven Kayton
published
4.18
Joel Reiter
published
4.12
Michael Dedmond
published
3.94
Jasen Fici
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Kevin Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Spencer Steedley
published
3.67
Gary Kowalski
published 4
3.66
Chip Ashley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Mike Noble
published
3.49
Edward Bugg
published 4
3.29
Andy Michael
published 3.5
3.24
Ron Barbagli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Hawkins + Chip Ashley6065% gamesnot enough data
Andy Michael + Chip Ashley2356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Kayton
18W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
Joel Reiter
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
Michael Dedmond
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jasen Fici
102W–226L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Kevin Hawkins
119W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
Spencer Steedley
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Gary Kowalski
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Chip Ashley
127W–132L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Mike Noble
14W–22L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Edward Bugg
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Andy Michael
36W–58L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Ron Barbagli
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.