Teams

SFV - Girl Krush

2025 Adult 18 SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-21vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis CrewWon 21
W#1 DoublesCecilia Lam / Joanne Cho vs Grace Gillham / Ganga Chandramohan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Bayreuther / Debbi Dixon vs Felicity Wheeler / Desire Stephens4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesYoungju Navarro / Chung Mi Ferraro vs Melissa Byer / Rebecca Schneider6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Cristina Nava
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Youngju Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Tanya Arreola
published
Cecilia Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Joanne Cho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Cindy Bayreuther
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Debbi Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Joy Kim
published
2.60
Karen Crosby
published
2.54
Chung Mi Ferraro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
Laurie Patterson
published
2.45
Savina Kollmorgen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Kim + Youngju Navarro1449% games+8.4% vs expected
Debbi Dixon + Laurie Patterson1445% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cristina Nava
68W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Youngju Navarro
23W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Tanya Arreola
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cecilia Lam
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joanne Cho
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Cindy Bayreuther
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Debbi Dixon
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Joy Kim
12W–26L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Karen Crosby
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Chung Mi Ferraro
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
Laurie Patterson
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Savina Kollmorgen
1W–20L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.