Teams

Hebert/18/2.5/WD/LCRC

2025 Lake Charles Adult 18 & Over - Women · 2.5 LC (18&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-04vs Orduno/18/2.5/WD/DeRidderWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Musso / Mallory Beasley vs Candice Skinner / Sherry LeBleu6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Hebert vs Samantha Orduno6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Pitre / Mallory Bobo vs Tammy Brown / Susan Ham6-2, 6-1
2025-03-02vs Dulany/18/2.5/WD/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMallory Bobo / Callie Maddox vs Jo Waite / Kayla Hebert6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Hebert vs MacY Dulany6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Musso / Peyton Pawlicki vs Haley Bordelon / Shelby Leger6-1, 6-0
2025-02-23vs Mouton/Rutland/18/2.5/WD/LCRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMallory Beasley / Peyton Pawlicki vs Amelia Crawford / Kelly Juneau6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCallie Maddox vs Sara Prudhomme6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Hebert / Megan Musso vs Anitra Mouton / Katherine Stewart4-6, 5-7
2025-02-02vs Osbourn/18/2.5/WD/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMallory Beasley / Whitney Curole vs Michelle Bigwood / June Green6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Hebert vs Laurie Callaba6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMallory Bobo / Lauren Pitre vs Catherine Osbourn / Dawn Redd6-2, 6-4
2025-01-19vs Nixon-Morris/18/2.5/WD/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Musso / Mallory Beasley vs Jami Heard / Rachel Hoffpauir6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Hebert vs Stefanie Nixon4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMallory Bobo / Callie Maddox vs Kaysha Sims / JEN INMAN6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 LC (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Peyton Pawlicki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Callie Maddox
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Mallory Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
2.68
Megan Musso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Adrienne Hebert
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.21
Whitney Curole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Pitre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mallory Bobo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peyton Pawlicki
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Callie Maddox
22W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Mallory Beasley
16W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Megan Musso
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Adrienne Hebert
19W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Whitney Curole
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.21
Lauren Pitre
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Bobo
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.