Teams

KY/LOU/Voss/O’Connell2

2022 USTA TRI-LEVEL 40 & OVER ADULT · Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.73 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-25vs KY/LOU/St.ClairWon 10
W#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Diana Britton vs Vongmany Edmonds / Cara Robinson6-1, 6-3
2022-07-19vs KY/LOU/St.ClairWon 10
W#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Courtney Byrnes vs Tammy Pollock / Nancy Fetz6-1, 6-1
2022-06-17vs KY/LOU/Voss/GordinierWon 10
W#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Diana Britton vs Justina Powers / Michelle Brooks6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Diana Britton
published 4
3.95
Tonja Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Bryanna Friedman
published 4
Courtney Byrnes
published 4
3.68
Kelli Gordinier
published 4
3.57
Cammie O'Connell
published 4
3.42
Lisa Hester
published
3.40
Amber Bowling
published 3.5
3.29
Cheryl Fox
published 3.5
3.23
Carey Goldstein
published 3.5
3.17
Aiysha Billings
published 3.5
3.15
Kimberly McCarty
published
3.00
Wendi Haller
published
2.91
Tatiane Cavallazzi
published
2.69
Carrie Ehrhard
published 3
Julie Mcdonnell
published
Lisa Domene
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Gordinier + Cammie O'Connell5157% games+1.9% vs expected
Kelli Gordinier + Courtney Byrnes5078% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Britton
29W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Bryanna Friedman
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Courtney Byrnes
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kelli Gordinier
66W–55L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Cammie O'Connell
69W–36L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lisa Hester
18W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amber Bowling
53W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Cheryl Fox
58W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Carey Goldstein
23W–28L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Aiysha Billings
25W–35L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Kimberly McCarty
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Wendi Haller
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Tatiane Cavallazzi
30W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Carrie Ehrhard
24W–33L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
Julie Mcdonnell
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Domene
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.