Teams

BC-LLW-AltaVista/SteveKigawa

2024 ADULT 55 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.96 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Men - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Larry Daniels
published
4.08
Tom McFerson
published
3.96
Andrew Michell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Kangsung Yip
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Yun Kim
published
3.78
Duc Le
published 4
3.78
Loyd Villanueva
published 4
Brad Rutherford
published 4
Israel Mora
published 4
3.72
Koichi Ishihara
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Eric VanderPloeg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Kyungwon Kang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Al Jasinskas
published 4
3.62
Jeffery Kam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
3.45
Javad Kazemieh
published
3.28
Thad Malit
published
Robert Rudelius
published
Steven Kigawa
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Koichi Ishihara + Kangsung Yip4546% gamesnot enough data
Loyd Villanueva + Jeffery Kam4453% gamesnot enough data
Koichi Ishihara + Kyungwon Kang5255% gamesnot enough data
Kyungwon Kang + Kangsung Yip4352% gamesnot enough data
Koichi Ishihara + Andrew Michell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Larry Daniels
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
Tom McFerson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.08
4
Andrew Michell
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Kangsung Yip
132W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
Yun Kim
39W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Duc Le
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Loyd Villanueva
29W–38L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Brad Rutherford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Israel Mora
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Koichi Ishihara
66W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Eric VanderPloeg
186W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Kyungwon Kang
80W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Al Jasinskas
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Jeffery Kam
148W–117L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.62
4
Charlton Gillette
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Javad Kazemieh
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
Thad Malit
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Robert Rudelius
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Kigawa
76W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.