Teams

TOC.Raasch

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-26vs TOC.LevineLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Raasch / Susan Keen vs Marilyn Slaymaker / Summer DuMont1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesVivian Neto vs Jennifer Kazmierczak6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLori Jee vs Ashley Burch1-6, 2-6
2024-04-25vs ACP.HinckleySplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Keen / Lori Jee vs Jamie Hinckley / Megan Jaynes3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBridgett Murphy vs Leslie Roper6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMelissa Raasch vs Elizabeth Parrish6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Megan Richardson vs Jessica Revels / Sheri Lieffrig5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-04vs MD.RiddickWon 40
W#1 DoublesRebecca King / Vivian Neto vs Mary Ashley Hill / Jaclyn Englert6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Pedraza vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBridgett Murphy / Susan Fairlee vs Katy Rapp / Kendra McCormick7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMelissa Raasch vs Sheridan Orr6-3, 6-2
2024-03-21vs PW.CaseLost 12
L#1 DoublesBridgett Murphy / Melissa Raasch vs Jodi Case / Micha Federico1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca King / Lori Jee vs Meghan Arndts / Patricia Luecke1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Vivian Neto vs Deirdre Mladsi / Martha Priest7-5, 7-6
2024-03-14vs ACP.HinckleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesLori Jee / Vivian Neto vs Kelly Felten / Leslie Roper6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Christina Peters vs Jessica Revels / Karen Foster1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Raasch / Wendy Younkin vs Christine Dukiet / Jamie Hinckley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-02-29vs TOC.LevineLost 14
L#1 DoublesMelissa Raasch / Rebecca King vs Shayne Brodsgaard / Kristen Levine3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWendy Younkin vs Jennifer Kazmierczak1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLori Jee / Susan Fairlee vs Tracy Copeland / Christine Waychoff6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJulie Pedraza vs Ashley Burch2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Richardson / SIUHING LAI vs Diane Adams / Natalie Norris2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-22vs MD.RiddickWon 50
W#1 DoublesSusan Keen / Vivian Neto vs Erin Riddick / Kelli Leonard6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBridgett Murphy vs Katy Rapp6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca King / Wendy Younkin vs Jaclyn Englert / Mary Ashley Hill6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMelissa Raasch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSIUHING LAI / Susan Fairlee vs Kelly Pfrommer / Kelley Simpson6-0, 6-2
2024-02-15vs PW.CaseWon 31
W#1 DoublesSIUHING LAI / Lori Jee vs Marta Keyser / Martha Priest6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVivian Neto vs Heather Suddreth6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Pedraza / Glynda Westerbeek vs Sarah van Saun / Deirdre Mladsi3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBridgett Murphy / Melissa Raasch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Vivian Neto
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.94
Melissa Raasch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 21% · published 3
2.92
SIUHING LAI
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Julie Pedraza
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Lori Jee
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
2.61
Wendy Younkin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.61
Susan Keen
published
2.59
Bridgett Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
2.58
Megan Richardson
published
Glynda Westerbeek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Younkin + Melissa Raasch81249% games+9.3% vs expected
Melissa Raasch + Vivian Neto51147% games+9.1% vs expected
Julie Pedraza + Wendy Younkin7260% games+5.8% vs expected
Vivian Neto + Lori Jee13658% games+1.8% vs expected
Bridgett Murphy + SIUHING LAI7650% games+0.2% vs expected
Melissa Raasch + Bridgett Murphy51346% games−2.8% vs expected
Vivian Neto + SIUHING LAI4942% games−10.0% vs expected
Wendy Younkin + Lori Jee3737% games−12.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Vivian Neto
95W–88L career · 12 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Melissa Raasch
60W–104L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
SIUHING LAI
88W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Julie Pedraza
76W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Lori Jee
76W–93L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Wendy Younkin
84W–121L career · 7 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Susan Keen
3W–15L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.61
3
Bridgett Murphy
70W–109L career · type A · 11 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Megan Richardson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
Glynda Westerbeek
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.