Teams

BC-Double Trouble-Carlisle

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-11vs BAIN-The Slice Girls-CarrilloSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Soligon / Megan Elliott vs Angie Godfrey / Tara Moyer2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNatalie Banks vs Elizabeth Bergan6-1, 6-1
2023-02-25vs BAIN-The Slice Girls-CarrilloLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Carlisle / Karen Vanderhoek vs Leticia Blacker / Jennifer Carrillo5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTanya Rizzo vs Kirsten Nghiem6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Elliott / Joia Poort vs Mary Cropp / Pondra Perkins2-6, 1-6
2023-02-18vs TCSP-SpainLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Elliott / Joia Poort vs Rhenda Meiser / Leona Zamora1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Soligon vs Jenny Ott6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesErin Park / Tanya Rizzo vs Delia Fontaine / Jane Vail4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-11vs NWW-WSC-Raquettes-OnuWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Vanderhoek / Michele Desai vs Snezhana Stefanova / Raluca Hera2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Soligon vs Haley Neff-LaFord6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTanya Rizzo / Joia Poort vs Geanina Andreiu / Anca Zaharia6-3, 7-6
2023-02-05vs PL-The Volley Llamas-SmallSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDana Brown / Ann Carlisle vs Eloisa Tang / Mary Lane6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMegan Elliott / Tanya Rizzo vs Lisa Small / Lora Rosewater3-6, 1-6
2023-01-28vs TCSP-Full Metal Rackets-SteckSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTanya Rizzo / Erin Park vs Carrie Rosenthal / Lori Lindsay6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDana Brown / Natalie Banks vs Rhonda Bethurum / Suzie Heid2-6, 2-6
2023-01-22vs NWW-CP-van ZylLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Carlisle / Dana Brown vs Katie van Zyl / Amy Galanes4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Soligon vs Helen Jiang6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Banks / Megan Elliott vs Paige Jensen / Amy Wang2-6, 0-6
2023-01-14vs ETC-DavisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Carlisle / Joia Poort vs Nancy Danoff / Alysson Bashey2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathryn Soligon vs Jennifer Monahan DeMella6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTanya Rizzo / Erin Park vs Mary Casey / Susan Bussell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Erin Park
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Tanya Rizzo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.49
Kathryn Soligon
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Dana Brown
published 2.5
2.11
Joia Poort
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.06
Ann Carlisle
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Karen Vanderhoek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Natalie Banks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Niveen Heaton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Carlisle + Erin Park0633% games−12.9% vs expected
Tanya Rizzo + Erin Park2349% gamesnot enough data
Ann Carlisle + Karen Vanderhoek044 matchesnot enough data
Megan Elliott + Joia Poort033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Erin Park
42W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Tanya Rizzo
22W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Kathryn Soligon
36W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Dana Brown
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joia Poort
11W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Ann Carlisle
30W–69L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Karen Vanderhoek
8W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Elliott
1W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Natalie Banks
12W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Niveen Heaton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.