Teams

LSAWard/RR Sing 18s W 3.5

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles League · Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 SinglesAmy Ward vs Kim Kelly Senff6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaryGwen Murash vs Jennifer Ross6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Kim Kelly Senff6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Ward vs Danielle Mikolajczyk6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesShelly Brock vs Cindy Long6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaryGwen Murash vs Christine Caruso1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJulie Lyerly vs Jennifer Saxton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Christine Caruso6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTerri Utz vs Danielle Mikolajczyk2-6, 4-6
2023-06-19Won 10
W#3 SinglesShelly Brock vs Cindy Long6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMaryGwen Murash vs Kim Kelly Senff4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMeredith Ortiz vs Christine Caruso2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesTerri Utz vs Bonnie Zentner6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Ward vs Shannon Hirschfeld6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Michelle Turk
published
3.95
Amy Ward
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.61
MaryGwen Murash
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.39
Erin MacAulay
published
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.30
Julie Lyerly
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Terri Utz
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.64
Shelly Brock
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Utz + Meredith Ortiz10255% gamesnot enough data
MaryGwen Murash + Meredith Ortiz4258% gamesnot enough data
Terri Utz + Erin MacAulay314 matchesnot enough data
MaryGwen Murash + Julie Lyerly123 matchesnot enough data
MaryGwen Murash + Amy Ward303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Turk
10W–0L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Amy Ward
242W–97L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
MaryGwen Murash
133W–111L career · 6 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Erin MacAulay
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Julie Lyerly
82W–86L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Terri Utz
105W–92L career · 6 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Shelly Brock
86W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.