Teams

2 MAC Novak Machine

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-19vs 5 Avalon SpruillWon 10
W#1 DoublesTimea Harisova / Jeremy Calbreath vs Anna Baird / Jon Mullis6-0, 6-1
2022-11-13vs 9 MTC Martin OspreysWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Kayci McLeod vs Denise Martin / Thomas Kinsling6-2, 6-1
2022-11-12vs 3 Hermitage LinesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Timea Harisova vs Kathleen Crotty / David Blankley6-2, 6-3
2022-11-06vs 1 Twin Hickory Hit & RunWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Karin Meissner vs Sumit Kumar / Dabney Topp6-3, 6-4
2022-10-29vs 12 Lakeside NaborsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Susan Rogers vs William Weber / Christina Saunders6-1, 6-4
2022-09-18vs 7 ACAC Preusser/HammittWon 10
W#1 DoublesTimea Harisova / Jeremy Calbreath vs Corey Winston / Jen Waller6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jeremy Calbreath
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.21
Timea Harisova
published
3.04
CONSTANCE MATTOX
published 3
2.97
Kayci McLeod
published
2.85
Anne Wolff
published 3
2.85
Lance Pessarra
published
2.77
2.74
Joseph Gault
published
2.65
Susanna Dodd
published
2.59
John Rogers
published
2.42
Dan Dennis
published 2.5
Karin Meissner
published
Ralph Novak
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeremy Calbreath
164W–53L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
Timea Harisova
33W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3
CONSTANCE MATTOX
29W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
Kayci McLeod
27W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Anne Wolff
23W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Lance Pessarra
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Clarissa McDonough
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Joseph Gault
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Susanna Dodd
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
John Rogers
14W–22L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
2.59
2.5
Dan Dennis
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
0%74%26%
2.42
Karin Meissner
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ralph Novak
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.