Teams

STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0W

2023 Adult 55 & Over · Women 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-23vs TahoeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSherry Taylor / Felice Rolnick vs Denise Inman / Sandy Ashmore6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLorrie Crossett / Carrie Lutterman vs Linda Steinmetz / Shelley Fridley6-1, 6-0
2023-05-16vs TahoeWon 20
W#1 DoublesAntoinette Kovar / Dana Metzger vs Sandy Ashmore / Shelley Fridley6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Bazan / Alice Hobaugh vs Denise Inman / Linda Steinmetz6-4, 7-6
2023-05-09vs TahoeWon 10
W#2 DoublesAntoinette Kovar / Felice Rolnick vs Cynthia Harrison / Laura Dyer6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-02vs TahoeWon 30
W#1 DoublesVictoria Wright / Dana Metzger vs Linda Steinmetz / Sandy Ashmore3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAntoinette Kovar / Kari Richardson vs Denise Inman / Laura Dyer7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFelice Rolnick / Carrie Lutterman vs Shelley Fridley / Betty Feder6-4, 6-1
2023-04-25vs TahoeLost 01
L#1 DoublesKari Richardson / Victoria Wright vs Sandy Ashmore / Linda Steinmetz6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-18vs TahoeWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorrie Crossett / Antoinette Kovar vs Denise Inman / Sandy Ashmore7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Bazan / Dana Metzger vs Shelley Fridley / Linda Steinmetz6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0W60162795
2Tahoe0621634202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Lorrie Crossett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Sherry Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Dana Metzger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Antoinette Kovar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.61
Felice Rolnick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Bazan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Wright
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorrie Crossett + Antoinette Kovar261158% games+7.3% vs expected
Dana Metzger + Antoinette Kovar2342% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Taylor + Lorrie Crossett4170% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorrie Crossett
68W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Sherry Taylor
47W–72L career · 1 line in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.99
4.5
Dana Metzger
57W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.85
4.5
Antoinette Kovar
77W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.79
Felice Rolnick
40W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Mary Bazan
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Wright
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.