Teams

Coconino

2023 Adult Tri-Level - NAZ · NAZ Mens 3.0-5.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-15vs NAU ClubWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Curtis / Sterling Fetty vs Finn Faller / Hayden Jones6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCole James / Timothy Weber vs Dylan Kwan / Benjamin Delgado6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJacob Bordelon / Bob Boyer vs Aidan Allen / Patrick Biegun7-6, 7-6
2023-10-15vs LumberjacksLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Curtis / Sterling Fetty vs Leyton Fetty / Trent Calleja3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCole James / Timothy Weber vs Camden Fetty / Dan Salcito7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJacob Bordelon / Bob Boyer vs Craig Bearchell / Bob Guzley6-2, 6-3
2023-10-14vs LumberjacksLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Curtis / Lance Green vs Leyton Fetty / Trent Calleja5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTimothy Weber / Cole James vs Camden Fetty / Dan Salcito2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJacob Bordelon / Bob Boyer vs Craig Bearchell / Bob Guzley6-3, 6-4
2023-10-14vs FlagstaffWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Curtis / Lance Green vs Steven Riggs / Mitchell Riggs6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTimothy Weber / Cole James vs Derek Miller / Michael Chan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJacob Bordelon / Bob Boyer vs Gary Vallen / Blake Cain6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NAZ Mens 3.0-5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Sterling Fetty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Timothy Weber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jacob Bordelon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cole James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Bob Boyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lance Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Bordelon + Bob Boyer5063% gamesnot enough data
Cole James + Timothy Weber224 matchesnot enough data
Sterling Fetty + Lance Green123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sterling Fetty
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
Timothy Weber
33W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Jacob Bordelon
24W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Cole James
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Bob Boyer
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.10
John Curtis
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lance Green
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.