Teams

18 & Over Women 2.5 - Luis Bachetti Torrimar

Adult 18 & Over 2022 · 2022 18 & Over Women 2.5 - Flight 2

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesLaura E Lugo Hernandez / Lourdes Arroyo vs Alexandra Roig / Damaris Marrero6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Carmen Gonzalez vs Amanda Ortega / GLORIA M MIRANDA6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Valerie MacIas vs Carol Badillo / Gabriella Gracia3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura E Lugo Hernandez / Carmen Gonzalez vs Rina Gonzalez / Magaly Arocho7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Gabriella Paglieri vs Gretell Baez / Ivette Maldonado6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesLaura E Lugo Hernandez / Valerie MacIas vs Rina Gonzalez / Magaly Arocho6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesGabriella Paglieri vs Annette Maldonado6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Valerie MacIas vs Alexandra Roig / Amanda Ortega6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGabriella Paglieri / Kristina Hoffman vs GLORIA M MIRANDA / Maria I Ortiz6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBrenda Castro Diaz / Gabriella Paglieri vs GLORIA M MIRANDA / Damaris Marrero6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaura E Lugo Hernandez / Carmen Gonzalez vs CAMILLE ROIG / Janellisse Casiano Ruiz2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 18 & Over Women 2.5 - Flight 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Gabriella Paglieri
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
2.99
Laura E Lugo Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Brenda Castro Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Silin Li
published
2.49
Ana Garcia
published 2.5
Lewis Bachetti
published
Mariola Porrata
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Castro Diaz + Gabriella Paglieri8266% games+11.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gabriella Paglieri
63W–41L career · 8 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Laura E Lugo Hernandez
63W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Brenda Castro Diaz
61W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Silin Li
17W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
2.5
Ana Garcia
46W–42L career · type A · no lines in 2022
0%53%47%
2.49
Lewis Bachetti
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mariola Porrata
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.