Teams

WI Adult 40&O 4.5 W GML Oconomowoc HS Toboyek

2022 WI Adult 40 & Over · WI Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women (Eve)

13 players · average NTRP 4.19 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesSarah Hardacre / Sarah Schuler vs Heidi Vizgaitis / Jennifer Fleck2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Wickersham vs Louella Amos1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanine Sullivan / Lindsey Beeler vs Beth Horneffer / Nicolette Timm3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / Dale Sloan vs Angela Orentas / Mara Malloy1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesNicole Griglione / Giang Bui vs Heidi Vizgaitis / Beth Horneffer4-6, 2-4
L#1 SinglesLindsey Beeler vs Meghan Posnanski0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / Sarah Hardacre vs Alexandra Pasher / Nicolette Timm4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDale Sloan / Michelle Webster vs Susan Schneider / Angela Orentas5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJanine Sullivan / Giang Bui vs Beth Horneffer / Mara Malloy0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Schuler vs Louella Amos0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Webster / Myrna Long vs Alexandra Pasher / Jennifer Fleck3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / Sarah Hardacre vs Susan Schneider / Angela Orentas3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDale Sloan / Sarah Schuler vs Mara Malloy / Angela Orentas3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Wickersham vs Louella Amos6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / Myrna Long vs Susan Schneider / Meghan Posnanski4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Hardacre / Giang Bui vs Nicolette Timm / Tricia Ward7-5
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / Sarah Hardacre vs Beth Horneffer / Heidi Vizgaitis3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Wickersham vs Louella Amos1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDale Sloan / Lindsey Beeler vs Nicolette Timm / Jennifer Fleck4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanine Sullivan / Sarah Schuler vs Susan Schneider / Tricia Ward5-7, 2-0
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wickersham / Nicole Griglione vs Heidi Vizgaitis / Jennifer Fleck2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLindsey Beeler vs Louella Amos3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / Kathryn Ullman vs Beth Horneffer / Nicolette Timm1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Hardacre / Michelle Webster vs Alexandra Pasher / Susan Schneider2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women (Eve) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Giang Bui
published 4.5
4.10
Nicole Griglione
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Charlotte Toboyek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Dale Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.81
Jacqueline Wickersham
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Michelle Webster
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Sarah Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Janine Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kathryn Ullman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Beeler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Myrna Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Hardacre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Webster + Dale Sloan301459% games+4.4% vs expected
Charlotte Toboyek + Dale Sloan21563% games+2.7% vs expected
Nicole Griglione + Jacqueline Wickersham134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Hardacre + Charlotte Toboyek033 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Wickersham + Brecken Ashenbrenner033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Schuler + Lindsey Beeler033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Schuler + Janine Sullivan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brecken Ashenbrenner
11W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Giang Bui
33W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Nicole Griglione
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4
Charlotte Toboyek
113W–51L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Dale Sloan
100W–40L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jacqueline Wickersham
28W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Michelle Webster
224W–118L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Sarah Schuler
50W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Janine Sullivan
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathryn Ullman
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lindsey Beeler
33W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Myrna Long
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Hardacre
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.