Teams

Johnson-Volley Venom

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Brad Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker / PATRICK GOTTSCH vs Michael Lee / Charlie Adams6-2, 6-1
2022-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker / Robert Glenn vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / Nate Larsen6-4, 7-5
2022-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker / Brad Johnson vs Tyler Clark / Lamone Voravongseng4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Brad Johnson vs Bryan Shieh / Neville Mehta6-3, 6-1
2022-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / PATRICK GOTTSCH vs Huy Bui / Nate Larsen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Brad Johnson vs Charlie Adams / Chris Hasle6-4, 6-2
2022-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker / Robert Glenn vs Eric Halvorson / Lamone Voravongseng6-1, 6-4
2022-06-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Nick Hooker vs Bryan Shieh / Neville Mehta1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
3.5
Brad Johnson
196W–102L career
0%87%13%
3.48
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.