Teams

Songstad/Hermann/Nashville

2026 Combo 40 & Over - Nashville · 8.5 Women - MON AM

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 9 9:00 AM
vs Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville
Hillwood Country Club
2026-08-27vs McWaters/Vestevich/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Simpson / Kathryn Harlan vs Heather Skipper / Corey Ilesco6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatti Hudgins / Kelley Durham vs Cindy Mccullough / Shannon McWaters6-0, 6-2
2026-08-24vs McDonald/Demouy/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelley Durham / Marie Hope Kirkland vs Vonda Darr / Robin Gilliam4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShelly Laub / Erin Simpson vs Suzanne Cox / Rachel Lovingood6-4, 7-5
2026-08-17vs Robinson/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Simpson / Felice Oldacre vs Liza Robinson / Marissa Welsh7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatti Hudgins / Elizabeth Waller vs Amy Gilmore / Carrie Jones4-6, 3-6
2026-08-10vs PM - Csernovicz/NashvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatti Hudgins / Kelley Durham vs Jeanai Kluge / Heather Laney6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Simpson / Elizabeth Waller vs Brandy Gardner / Amy Cesarone6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-03vs McWaters/Vestevich/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatti Hudgins / Kelley Durham vs Shannon McWaters / Lindsay Bentley2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Simpson / Felice Oldacre vs Corey Ilesco / Leah Lamphron3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 8.5 Women - MON AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Davis/Neal/Nashville3090253
2Randolph/Nashville3081675
3Andrews/Nashville2163771
4LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille2154867
5Brown/Cesarone/Nashville21541078
6Dearman/Thomas/Nashville21541091
7Songstad/Hermann/Nashville1254978
8Blevins/Thomas/Nashville0112426
9Fisher/Baas/Nashville02061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Erin Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.08
Patti Hudgins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Felice Oldacre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Christy Hermann
published 4
3.75
Gretchen Dahle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Shelly Laub
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Edith Kirkland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Kelley Durham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Marie Hope Kirkland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer McKenzie
published
Ynell Songstad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patti Hudgins + Erin Simpson8255% games−0.9% vs expected
Felice Oldacre + Erin Simpson224 matchesnot enough data
Christy Hermann + Gretchen Dahle224 matchesnot enough data
Patti Hudgins + Kelley Durham303 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Durham + Shelly Laub303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Simpson
30W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Patti Hudgins
26W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
Felice Oldacre
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Christy Hermann
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Gretchen Dahle
22W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
Shelly Laub
35W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Edith Kirkland
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kelley Durham
24W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Marie Hope Kirkland
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
Jennifer McKenzie
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ynell Songstad
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.