Teams

TOHS.Byrd

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-24vs MD.MoriartyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJORGE GODOY GOMIS / Visakan Jayakumar vs Chris Crumpler / Jim Riddick6-0, 6-3
2023-09-16vs TOHS.BrownLost 01
L#3 DoublesJORGE GODOY GOMIS / Beomjun Ju vs Stephen Laroche / Patrick Longest2-6, 2-6
2023-09-10vs TOHS.LlewellynWon 20
W#1 DoublesVisakan Jayakumar / JORGE GODOY GOMIS vs Aaron Kirschenfeld / Thomas Hughes6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Siddhant Pal vs Matthew Hanauer / Curtis Lawson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-09-06vs TOHS.BrownWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Siddhant Pal vs Davis Felts / Parker Sheridan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesJORGE GODOY GOMIS / Revanth Bobba vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-13vs TOC.JavalkarWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrett Eckles / Siddhant Pal vs Hady Abi-Aad / Gowthaman Mohan6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Brandon Dauler
published 5
4.78
JORGE GODOY GOMIS
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.52
Kwame Owens
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 5
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Sean Hammer
published
Blake Hutchinson
published 4.5
4.23
Visakan Jayakumar
published
4.15
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jermaine Byrd + Kwame Owens4355% gamesnot enough data
Brett Eckles + Kwame Owens5165% gamesnot enough data
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brandon Dauler
9W–3L career · type D · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.81
JORGE GODOY GOMIS
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.78
5
Kwame Owens
168W–56L career · 11 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
Sean Hammer
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Blake Hutchinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Visakan Jayakumar
24W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 4 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.