Teams

SAN JOSE SR CW5.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 5.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Pauline Teunissen
published
3.34
Lisa Baumert
published
3.20
Dana Knapp
published 3.5
3.05
Megan Polhemus
published
3.01
Sheila Hutchinson
published
Amy Castello
published 3
2.72
Amanda Ramos
published 3
2.65
Karen Kim
published
2.60
Margaret Ma
published
2.50
Luann Wiggenhorn
published
2.46
Traci Armstrong
published
2.40
Eunyoung Feucht
published
2.33
Leslie Johnson
published
2.29
Sara Sanders
published
2.21
Maryann Schwartz
published
1.92
Amy Barzdukas
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Teunissen + Lisa Baumert2443% games−9.0% vs expected
Dana Knapp + Lisa Baumert314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Lisa Baumert
34W–33L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Dana Knapp
15W–18L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Megan Polhemus
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Sheila Hutchinson
13W–30L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Amy Castello
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Amanda Ramos
10W–28L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Karen Kim
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65
Margaret Ma
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%24%76%
2.60
Luann Wiggenhorn
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Traci Armstrong
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%62%38%
2.46
Eunyoung Feucht
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%76%24%
2.40
Leslie Johnson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.33
Sara Sanders
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.29
Maryann Schwartz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Amy Barzdukas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.