Teams

DTC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-10vs RCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelene Grall-Johnson / Deborah Yoder vs Ann Larson / Martha Hamilton6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Kathleen Andrews vs Patricia Sato / Vicki Simpson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Wulliman / Linda Feiman vs Cindy Ronlov / Janice Bailey7-6, 6-2
2023-08-04vs CACM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesJann Peterson / Jody Hunnicutt vs Mary Beth Church / Bev Morrow7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Julie Underdahl vs Diane Mapes / Kathryn Terry1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Feiman / Helene Grall-Johnson vs Paula Broe / Betty Murray6-4, 6-2
2023-08-03vs CACM ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Kathleen Andrews vs Susan High / Lise Uhrich6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Nakano / Deborah Yoder vs Barbara Worthington / Mary McFadyen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs Anne Angerman / Christine McKinlay6-2, 6-1
2023-07-27vs BTA-C BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Kathleen Andrews vs Polly Rothberg / Patsy James6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHelene Grall-Johnson / Deborah Yoder vs Barbara Brockman / Samantha McBride6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Nakano / Kathy Graveley vs Laurie Leinonen / Kimberly Gerra6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2023-07-13vs MC PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Jann Peterson vs Kathleen Keating / Lorette Nieuwenhuizen6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Feiman / Susan Nakano vs Marie Louise Barrett / Katherine Phillips6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs Teri Harrington / Linda Wagner7-5, 6-4
2023-07-06vs RCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Jann Peterson vs Teri Jean Fry / Cindy Ronlov6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Kathleen Andrews vs Jeanne Vonachen / Vicki Simpson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHelene Grall-Johnson / Linda Feiman vs Cher Babkiewich / Martha Hamilton6-2, 6-1
2023-06-29vs CACM ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Underdahl / Kathleen Andrews vs Mary McFadyen / Lise Uhrich6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Nakano / Helene Grall-Johnson vs Susan High / Barbara Worthington7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Linda Feiman vs Suzann Gobis / Christine McKinlay6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Wulliman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Julie Underdahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.11
Jann Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Linda Feiman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Nakano
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Helene Grall-Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Deborah Yoder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kathy Graveley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathleen Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Feiman + Jody Hunnicutt10358% games+7.1% vs expected
Linda Feiman + Susan Nakano19758% games+5.0% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Jann Peterson171058% games+1.2% vs expected
Deborah Yoder + Julie Underdahl4353% games+1.1% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Jann Peterson5356% games+0.9% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Deborah Yoder3250% games+0.4% vs expected
Julie Underdahl + Jann Peterson2548% games−0.1% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Julie Underdahl6552% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Rebecca Wulliman
34W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Julie Underdahl
53W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.17
3.5
Jann Peterson
51W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Linda Feiman
55W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Susan Nakano
57W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.00
3.5
Helene Grall-Johnson
31W–83L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Deborah Yoder
37W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Kathy Graveley
38W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Andrews
39W–17L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.