Teams

BC-Lakewood/JohnTuppal

2024 Mixed 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-16vs BC-Kramer/ChristopherBallWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Pila / Hubert Taton vs Joyce Wahba / Bushra Abdelmalak6-0, 6-1
2024-02-18vs BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodaniLost 12
W#1 DoublesFranklin de la Rosa / Anne Pila vs Barry St John / Silvia Secondari7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanny Le / Rosalinda Fazio vs Edward Schuh / Kitty Fitzgerald1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSAL DEGUZMAN / Ingrid Leon vs Buck Snyder / Denise Matsumoto4-6, 2-6
2024-02-17vs BC-LLW-MCC/JohnZinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Pila / Franklin de la Rosa vs Audra Steller / Eric Steller6-4, 6-0
2024-02-03vs BC-WestEnd/DebiRaaschLost 01
L#1 DoublesARIEL RAMACULA / Ingrid Leon vs Jane Song-Gee / Brad Jacobson3-6, 1-6
2024-01-28vs BC-Kramer/ChristopherBallWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Pila / Franklin de la Rosa vs Jennifer Giordano / Ryan McCormick6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-01-27vs BC-MCC/JoiGillamWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Pila / Franklin de la Rosa vs Kristie Sherrill / Gerald Torres6-2, 6-2
2024-01-06vs BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodaniWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Pila / Franklin de la Rosa vs Vanessa Hyttenberg / Gregory Olson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSharon Alston / Narciso Frias vs Silvia Secondari / Mohammad Holil1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Mixed 18 & Over - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Anne Pila
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.74
MALU NORTON
published
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
SAL DEGUZMAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Katherine Rice
published
Dandan Zhang
published 3
2.74
Ingrid Leon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Sharon Alston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Alston + SAL DEGUZMAN224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Pila
122W–42L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
MALU NORTON
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 1 line in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
SAL DEGUZMAN
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Katherine Rice
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Dandan Zhang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ingrid Leon
73W–128L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Sharon Alston
48W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.