Teams

OC Palisades - Colleen

2022 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-18vs OC LLW Boot Camp - FVTC - TranLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Murdy / Paul Kincaid vs Jinna Johnson / Frank Tran6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Kincaid / Jennifer Murdy vs Kristina Ebon / Nhan Do3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesAustin Galliguez / Jennifer Murdy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Kincaid / Jennifer Murdy vs Nhan Do / Kristina Ebon3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-09vs OC Woodbridge - Sabrina Sun 4pmWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Kincaid / Jennifer Murdy vs Andre Law / Laura Myers6-4, 6-4
2022-08-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Murdy / Paul Kincaid vs Joey Paynter / Johnson Jiang6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Isabelle Benoit
published 5
4.75
Betsy Purpura
published 5
4.63
Brahna Pastorini
published 5
4.59
Jennifer Zick
published
4.39
Colleen Scanlon
published 4.5
4.30
Jennifer Murdy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Brandon Hovard
published 4.5
Heather Linhart
published 4.5
4.19
Michael Peltz
published
4.14
Joshua Snyder
published
3.97
Paul Kincaid
published
3.94
Samantha Mills
published
3.81
Chelsea Bailey
published 4
3.66
Maria Heropoulos
published
Kyle Laskie
published
Meghan Ball
published
Toby Bogard
published
Troy Ripley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Isabelle Benoit
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.80
5
Betsy Purpura
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.75
5
Brahna Pastorini
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.63
Jennifer Zick
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
4.59
4.5
Colleen Scanlon
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Jennifer Murdy
44W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Brandon Hovard
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Heather Linhart
28W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Peltz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Joshua Snyder
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.14
Paul Kincaid
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
Samantha Mills
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Chelsea Bailey
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Maria Heropoulos
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Kyle Laskie
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meghan Ball
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Toby Bogard
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Troy Ripley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.