Teams

Duffy'sDivas / Players Club - J.Pearson

2023 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-23vs Fiddlers Creek - D. CooperWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Jeffries / Jean Duffy vs Dawn Cooper / Megan Millard6-4, 6-2
2023-05-12vs Pelican Bay South - HowardWon 10
W#3 DoublesJean Duffy / Suzanne Jeffries vs Judi Howard / Sher Canada6-3, 6-4
2023-05-09vs VineyardsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDoris Duignan / Jean Duffy vs Patricia MacDonald / Margot Moran4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJean Duffy / Doris Duignan vs Cory Witters / Terri Higgins6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-18vs Valencia Bonita - GredingerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Duffy / Lisa Mancini vs Lorraine Steuerer / Bobbi Burnett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJean Duffy / Doris Duignan vs Maureen Rennie / Julie Lenhart3-6, 5-7
2023-03-21vs Isles Of Collier - M. YoungWon 10
W#2 DoublesJean Duffy / Lisa Mancini vs Lisa Hayes / Michelle Young6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Doris Duignan
published
Christine Whitman
published 3.5
3.07
Lisa Mancini
published
2.96
Jean Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.35
Christi Krieger
published 2.5
Donna Dolan
published
Gerrie Logan
published
Heather Claes
published
Julie Pearson
published
Kristine Riecker
published
Lisa McNichol
published
Nancy Stepniewski
published
Robin Baker
published
Sandy Brewer
published
Suzanne Jeffries
published
Yvette Harrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Dolan + Kristine Riecker4164% gamesnot enough data
Gerrie Logan + Kristine Riecker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doris Duignan
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Christine Whitman
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Mancini
22W–23L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Jean Duffy
63W–59L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
2.96
2.5
Christi Krieger
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.35
Donna Dolan
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Gerrie Logan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Heather Claes
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Pearson
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristine Riecker
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa McNichol
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Stepniewski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Baker
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Brewer
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Jeffries
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yvette Harrison
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.