Teams

Highgrove- McEldoon

2024 SCTA Spring '24 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women · Weekday Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.07 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Weekday Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Brooke Moore
published 3.5
3.47
Stacee Mceldoon
published
3.44
Karen Zeng
published
3.40
Jennifer Dorrien
published
3.32
Mercy Forsyth
published
3.27
Lindsay Hepler
published
2.94
Dana Lezaj
published 3
2.90
Victoria Wyatt
published
2.84
Carol Corrigan
published 3
2.83
Renee Awtry
published
2.82
2.79
Amie Craddock
published 3
2.78
Cathy Chordegian
published 3
2.76
Kristin Hancock
published
2.72
Jennifer Hazelton
published
2.66
Mattie Smith
published
2.57
Buffie Davenport
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Hancock + Amie Craddock0539% games−0.9% vs expected
Mattie Smith + Victoria Wyatt142443% games−4.9% vs expected
Mattie Smith + Buffie Davenport134 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Wyatt + Denise Hofrichter044 matchesnot enough data
Renee Awtry + Cathy Chordegian134 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hepler + Amie Craddock224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hepler + Brooke Moore224 matchesnot enough data
Mattie Smith + Lindsay Hepler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooke Moore
46W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Stacee Mceldoon
42W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
Karen Zeng
34W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Jennifer Dorrien
26W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Mercy Forsyth
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Lindsay Hepler
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Dana Lezaj
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
Victoria Wyatt
39W–68L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Carol Corrigan
28W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
Renee Awtry
17W–29L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Denise Hofrichter
25W–39L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Amie Craddock
29W–48L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Cathy Chordegian
17W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
Kristin Hancock
14W–33L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Jennifer Hazelton
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
Mattie Smith
35W–56L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Buffie Davenport
31W–46L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.