Teams

Owens/Pebble Creek/Fhills

2024 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 18 & over · 4.0 Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-01vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Lewis / Karen Tonks vs Scott Robinson / Helen Woy4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Lee Honeycutt Jr / Lynne Place vs Aaron Swisher / Jenette Swisher6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-25vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesDouglas Lee Honeycutt Jr / Lynne Place vs George Bolter / Deirdre Bolter5-7, 4-6
2024-07-18vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlex Boone / Lynne Place vs Aaron Swisher / Jenette Swisher0-6, 0-6
2024-07-11vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesDouglas Lee Honeycutt Jr / Lynne Place vs Russell Woy / Helen Woy6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-06-27vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Lewis / Karen Tonks vs Scott Robinson / Sunday Richardson3-6, 2-6
2024-06-20vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlex Boone / Charlotte Hartman vs George Bolter / Deirdre Bolter2-6, 1-6
2024-06-06vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Lewis / Karen Tonks vs Aaron Steen / Alisa Crooks1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVu Nguyen / Lynne Place vs Scott Robinson / Sunday Richardson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tammy Dennis
published
3.77
Karen Tonks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jeanne Ann Lewis
published
3.66
3.52
Lynne Place
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
3.47
Alex Boone
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.43
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.40
Clay Dennis
published 3.5
3.27
Bo Lewis
published 3.5
William Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Tonks + Alex Boone134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Dennis
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Jeanne Ann Lewis
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Lynne Place
149W–164L career · 5 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Alex Boone
61W–74L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Clay Dennis
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Bo Lewis
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
William Lewis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.