Teams

UPTA18FF/Hucks/Hwy 14

2025 Fun Fall 18 & over - GTL · 2.5 Women FF

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-21vs UPTA18FF/Corley/PavilionWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Sarah Hansen vs Ashley Rehn / Tina Langley6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatallia Sianko vs Anne Gossmann6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Halliday / Heather Young vs Anne Henry / Molly Manning4-6, 4-6
2025-11-14vs UPTA18FF/Kaurloto/KeoweeKeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Halliday / Elizabeth Mccutchen vs Susan Kaurloto / Jill Heintz3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAshley Hill vs Suzanne Piechotta6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Bright / Heather Young vs Julia Kreisher / Sherry Blaha2-6, 1-6
2025-11-03vs UPTA18FF/Howard/KrocWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Natallia Sianko vs Blake Brookshire / Miller Howard6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAshley Hill vs Joy Howard6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelissa Hucks / Laura Halliday vs Caroline Smoak / Heather Ware6-7, 5-7
2025-10-24vs UPTA18FF/Neil/River WalkLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Halliday / Madina Cauthen vs Jessa Shiner / Lucie Bujetova Sliva0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Foss vs Meg Powers2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNatallia Sianko / Heather Young vs Lauren Young / Michelle Callahan2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-17vs UPTA18FF/Hughes/GCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Halliday / Kara Paulk vs Virginia Hayes / Kristen McLean4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAshley Hill vs Holly Sellers0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Bright / Melissa Hucks vs Elizabeth Rasor / Lacey Morgan6-2, 7-5
2025-10-10vs UPTA18FF/Belflower/Sugar CreekWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadina Cauthen / Ashley Hill vs Kristen Belflower / Sara Fox6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Mccutchen vs Emily Busold6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Hucks / Sarah Hansen vs Meg Mcgee / Mary Chappell Pettit6-1, 6-2
2025-10-03vs UPTA18FF/Benson/ThornbladeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Hucks / Rebecca Foss vs Rachael Benson / Collins Reingardt6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Hill vs Margaret Crumpler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Spinelli / Emily Goforth vs Amy Kimbell / Ashley Slagel7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Natallia Sianko
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Ashley Hill
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.53
Elizabeth Mccutchen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.49
Emily Goforth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.49
Madina Cauthen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Rebecca Foss
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.31
Kara Paulk
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Anne Spinelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Sarah Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.20
Melissa Hucks
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.05
Diane Bright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laura Halliday
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madina Cauthen + Natallia Sianko404 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Hucks + Laura Halliday044 matchesnot enough data
Madina Cauthen + Sarah Hansen213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Hucks + Ashley Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Goforth + Anne Spinelli123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natallia Sianko
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
2.5
Ashley Hill
15W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.62
Elizabeth Mccutchen
2W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%41%59%
2.53
Emily Goforth
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Madina Cauthen
33W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Rebecca Foss
16W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Kara Paulk
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Anne Spinelli
3W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Hansen
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Melissa Hucks
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Diane Bright
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Laura Halliday
1W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.