Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Schwalger

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 5.0M

13 players · average NTRP 4.75 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-14vs Utah/Arena/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesEliott Moreno / Jackson Fischer vs Christopher Arena / Johnathan Lieu7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDuane Schwalger / Ruben Trauba vs Matt Sweet / Tomasz Soltyka4-6, 4-6
2025-06-07vs Park City MARC-SmithSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJerome Jourdon / Jackson Fischer vs Barry Hancock / James Brunt6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRuben Trauba vs Steven Goldberg7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-31Split 11
L#1 DoublesJerome Jourdon / Duane Schwalger vs Brandon Khoune / Alec Tzeng7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJackson Fischer vs Zakaria Hijaouy6-1, 6-2
2025-05-17vs Utah/Arena/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJerome Jourdon / Wayne Aggen vs Christopher Arena / Matt Sweet3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChase Stoner / Jackson Fischer vs Nathan Balls / Kris Rosander7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-10vs Park City MARC-SmithSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChad Toleafoa / Jerome Jourdon vs Jason Smith / Barry Hancock6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRuben Trauba vs John Kucera0-6, 3-6
2025-05-03vs Wasatch Hills-Silim/StoneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJerome Jourdon / Wayne Aggen vs Ian Supple / Brian Schmeer7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRuben Trauba / Chase Stoner vs Chandler Clayton / Riley Booker3-6, 2-6
2025-04-26vs Utah/Arena/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesGavin Hatter / Chase Stoner vs Corbin Benson / Matt Sweet6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWayne Aggen vs Nathan Balls2-6, 3-6
2025-04-22vs Park City MARC-SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesChase Stoner / Gavin Hatter vs Jason Smith / Nick von der Ahe6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJerome Jourdon vs James Brunt6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChad Toleafoa / Duane Schwalger vs John Trimble / Steven Goldberg3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs Wasatch Hills-Silim/StoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesWayne Aggen / Jerome Jourdon vs Brandon Khoune / Kolby Silim6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Utah/Arena/18&Over5.0M9024312179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Schwalger45121532252
3Wasatch Hills-Silim/Stone45111636269
4Park City MARC-Smith1872042290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chase Stoner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.58
Eliott Moreno
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.42
Jackson Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.36
Gavin Hatter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.35
Skyler Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
4.33
Chad Toleafoa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.33
Royce Plowman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.27
Duane Schwalger
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Mitchell Smith
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.17
Jerome Jourdon
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
4.14
Zack Zavodni
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
Ruben Trauba
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wayne Aggen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Toleafoa + Jerome Jourdon3255% games+10.4% vs expected
Skyler Hancock + Royce Plowman5163% games+9.3% vs expected
Duane Schwalger + Zack Zavodni9157% games+5.0% vs expected
Jackson Fischer + Jerome Jourdon5163% gamesnot enough data
Chad Toleafoa + Zack Zavodni404 matchesnot enough data
Eliott Moreno + Royce Plowman123 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Aggen + Jerome Jourdon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chase Stoner
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eliott Moreno
31W–15L career · 12 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.58
Jackson Fischer
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.42
Gavin Hatter
47W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
Skyler Hancock
22W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
5
Chad Toleafoa
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.33
Royce Plowman
39W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Duane Schwalger
43W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Mitchell Smith
45W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Jerome Jourdon
12W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.17
4.5
Zack Zavodni
48W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Ruben Trauba
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Aggen
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.