Teams

Gross/Lowell/MRC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesVictor Contreras / David Schneider vs Ramesh Subramanian / Vinodh Shankar2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKamren Roelke vs Arun Sundar Selvan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBill Fedorchak / Walker Dyer vs rajkumar Vijayakumar / Silambarasan Paramasivam2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAlexander Minero vs Smrutiranjan Parida1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGerardo Tavarez / Daniel Tapia vs Pravin Jothi / Palanivel Kalimuthu0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKamren Roelke / Bill Fedorchak vs Vimal Arasu Malayappan / NITHIYANANDHAN GANESAN0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlexander Minero vs Arun Sundar Selvan0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMatthew Gross / Bo Senesomxay vs Palanivel Kalimuthu / rajkumar Vijayakumar3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesVictor Contreras vs Ramesh Subramanian2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Chilton / Daniel Tapia vs Vinodh Shankar / Pravin Jothi1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Matthew Hanafin
published
2.80
Logan Imhoff
published
Alexander Minero
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Bill Fedorchak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Bo Senesomxay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Victor Contreras
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.51
John Ciulla
published
2.48
Kamren Roelke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Michael Chilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ali Comelekoglu
published 2.5
Daniel Tapia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gerardo Tavarez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Walker Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Logan Imhoff + Kamren Roelke3245% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Hanafin
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Logan Imhoff
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Alexander Minero
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bill Fedorchak
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bo Senesomxay
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Victor Contreras
4W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
John Ciulla
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Kamren Roelke
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Michael Chilton
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Ali Comelekoglu
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Daniel Tapia
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerardo Tavarez
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Walker Dyer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.