Teams

Sawmill Club: Flow State

2026 18&Over Women Day Winter · 3.0 Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-26vs WTC: 3.0 Rye RenegadesLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Jung / Meredith Outwater vs Kimberly Wilkes / Victoria Hennes6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLora Zaretsky / Amy Kelley vs Emily Cacciapaglia / Kelly Walsh0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Popp / Doreen Siciliano vs Rosa Rotondi / Jennifer Madden4-6, 3-6
2026-03-12vs Old OaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesAddie Havemeyer / Karen Jung vs Rory VanGelder / Robin Abrutyn6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLora Zaretsky / Maureen Popp vs Chelsea Fraenkel / Ilona Pokoik4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDoreen Siciliano / Amy Kelley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-06vs Club Fit JV AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAddie Havemeyer / Kim Lando vs Mary Ellen Bruno / Patricia Sullivan7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Leary / Christine Dimaano vs Delia Foran / Carol Wilson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLora Zaretsky / Sabrina Seidman vs Ann Castelli / Shang Guo2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-05vs Grand Slam: OverservedLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Outwater / Christine Dimaano vs Ronnie Caffrey / Maria Orozco2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSabrina Seidman / Maureen Popp vs Karen Richard / Ashley Kreger2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Kelley / Lora Zaretsky vs April Bauza / Maria Vasconcelos6-7, 4-5
2026-01-29vs Armonk Dome: Honey DeucesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Outwater / Kim Lando vs Courtney Boyce / Chloe O'Brien5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAddie Havemeyer / Karen Jung vs Dana O'Brien / Elizabeth Ward6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLora Zaretsky / Amy Kelley vs Francesca Heintz / Jessica Katsikas2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-21vs Club Fit Briarcliff ChallengersLost 12
W#1 DoublesAddie Havemeyer / Karen Jung vs Mandy Trahan / Lisa Zedlovich6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Dimaano / Lora Zaretsky vs Lisa Canecchia / Cori Landry0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDoreen Siciliano / Maureen Popp vs Masha Gregorius / Maria Vlock2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-01-15vs CRRC Wise AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesLora Zaretsky / Maureen Popp vs Jenn Salon / Melissa Mendez1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Leary / Karen Jung vs Kelley Ireland-Kelly / Rebecca Blumenthal7-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDoreen Siciliano / Amy Kelley vs Stefani Scamardo-Haynes / Michelle Gralitzer6-3, 7-5
2026-01-07vs ATC: WhippoorwillLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Dimaano / Sabrina Seidman vs Bridget Banta / ASHLEY KAUFMAN2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Kelley / Ann Leary vs Sloane Dunn / Joelle Rogal2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLora Zaretsky / Doreen Siciliano vs Christina Hayes / Diana Vettoretti2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kim Lando
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Meredith Outwater
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Addie Havemeyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Sabrina Seidman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Maureen Popp
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.72
Karen Jung
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.68
Christine Dimaano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Amy Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Ann Leary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Lora Zaretsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.31
Doreen Siciliano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Kelley + Sabrina Seidman81343% games−0.9% vs expected
Karen Jung + Ann Leary2342% games−6.8% vs expected
Karen Jung + Addie Havemeyer4247% gamesnot enough data
Christine Dimaano + Ann Leary1450% gamesnot enough data
Amy Kelley + Lora Zaretsky1445% gamesnot enough data
Christine Dimaano + Meredith Outwater314 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Outwater + Kim Lando314 matchesnot enough data
Lora Zaretsky + Maureen Popp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Lando
27W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Meredith Outwater
34W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Addie Havemeyer
26W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Sabrina Seidman
55W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Maureen Popp
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Karen Jung
74W–53L career · 11 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Christine Dimaano
46W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Amy Kelley
57W–112L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Ann Leary
40W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Lora Zaretsky
14W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Doreen Siciliano
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.