Teams

YTC-Meloy

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-22vs CBRC-McAteerWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Rojan / Marcie Ehlis vs Kathleen McAteer / Michelle Glenn7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDaphne Reilly vs Xia Suter4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Rinden / Molly Carlson vs Signe White / Hannah Sonnichsen6-2, 6-2
2026-03-21vs HRSC-CarterSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnne Rojan / Megan Beyer vs JENNIFER BELOY / Stacy Birch5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNatalie Richardson vs Peg Bogard6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Rinden / Larisa Flory vs Keely Kopetz / Mary Klinger6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDaphne Reilly / Marcie Ehlis vs Allison Crisp / Tammy Carter6-3, 6-2
2026-03-21vs PFC-GerisWon 32
L#1 DoublesMegan Beyer / Larisa Flory vs Caitlin Hicks / Alyssa Fitzgerald4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAnne Rojan vs Fasai Xiong7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngela Kerndl / Daphne Reilly vs Kelli Geris / Giang Bui6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNatalie Richardson vs Marianne Thompson6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMarcie Ehlis / Laural Klein vs Marissa Chau / Tiffany Sauer1-6, 0-6
2026-03-20vs SRC-NicelerWon 41
W#1 DoublesHeather Rinden / Megan Beyer vs Kiersten Shelby / Amber McCombs2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaphne Reilly vs Lupine Skelly6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngie Meloy / Larisa Flory vs COURTNEY LEWIS / Tamara McGregor6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnne Rojan vs Jenny Bryant6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTERESA FOSSUM / Laural Klein vs April Denike / Andrea Valentine4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-20vs EW-IND-RoseLost 05
L#1 DoublesMarcie Ehlis / Heather Rinden vs Allison Atkinson / Annette Rose2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNatalie Richardson vs Rachel Ayers - (DQ)0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Beyer / Molly Carlson vs Amy Nguyen / Erica Bjella1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDaphne Reilly vs Alisha Nguyen2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTERESA FOSSUM / Larisa Flory vs Emily McNabb / Kira Burt2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Daphne Reilly
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.88
Anne Rojan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.72
Angela Kerndl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Larisa Flory
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Heather Rinden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Megan Beyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Marcie Ehlis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Laural Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Angie Meloy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
TERESA FOSSUM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Estelle Patten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Molly Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Nancy Livingston
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Natalie Richardson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laural Klein + Estelle Patten5158% games+10.1% vs expected
Daphne Reilly + Molly Carlson7353% games+8.6% vs expected
Marcie Ehlis + Anne Rojan4158% games+1.0% vs expected
Heather Rinden + Megan Beyer3347% games−2.7% vs expected
TERESA FOSSUM + Angie Meloy4249% gamesnot enough data
Megan Beyer + Estelle Patten1438% gamesnot enough data
Laural Klein + Angie Meloy1438% gamesnot enough data
Megan Beyer + Anne Rojan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daphne Reilly
40W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Anne Rojan
47W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Angela Kerndl
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Larisa Flory
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Heather Rinden
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Megan Beyer
24W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Marcie Ehlis
40W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Laural Klein
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Angie Meloy
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
TERESA FOSSUM
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Estelle Patten
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Molly Carlson
32W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Nancy Livingston
65W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
Natalie Richardson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.