Teams

MLSSR-Sree/NMP 2290

2022 18 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 9.0 Thurs pm 18s

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-11vs LCRI-Richards/CSDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanna Huggins / Savan Ratanpara vs Christine Richards / Jasen Fici3-6, 4-6
2022-07-21vs LCRI-Richards/CSDLost 01
L#3 DoublesSavan Ratanpara / Janna Huggins vs David Gilroy / Toni Laney1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJared McKiernan / Janna Huggins vs Liam Miguel Selvido / Kristen Oliver0-6, 4-6
2022-06-30vs LCRI-Richards/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanna Huggins / Vaughn Schmutz vs Jasen Fici / Carey Lundberg6-2, 7-6
2022-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarl Yerger / Janna Huggins vs Liam Miguel Selvido / Kristen Oliver2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 9.0 Thurs pm 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Hannah Chillag
published 4.5
4.34
Kim Ezzo
published
4.26
Jared McKiernan
published
4.19
Vaughn Schmutz
published
3.97
Carl Yerger
published 4.5
3.79
Janna Huggins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.71
Savan Ratanpara
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hannah Chillag
21W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
4.41
Kim Ezzo
21W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
Jared McKiernan
7W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
Vaughn Schmutz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Carl Yerger
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Janna Huggins
64W–61L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Sreejith Sreedharan
88W–65L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Savan Ratanpara
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.