Teams

Lake Cane-Adcock

2024 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 40 & Over - SPRING-NIGHT · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Adcock / Katie Scheer vs Bing Wang / Mary Zhang6-0, 6-0
2024-05-28vs USTA Campus-MacKenzieWon 10
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Greiveldinger / Katie Scheer vs April Filer / Leslie Sanders6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-22vs Sanlando-NguyenWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Adcock / Katie Scheer vs Silvia Landgraf / Ella Simsek6-4, 6-4
2024-05-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Adcock / Katie Scheer vs Angela Chew / Yaneth Monsalve6-0, 6-2
2024-05-01vs OrangeSeminole/Luter/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Adcock / Katie Scheer vs Shara Lee / Gail Burr6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Katie Scheer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Mary Kroeger
published
3.12
Jessica Strack
published
2.94
Paula Adcock
published
2.84
Claudine Galt
published 3
2.82
Michelle Pergler
published
2.82
Marissa Woodruff
published
2.79
Marika Czerwinski
published
2.77
Erin Rauch
published
2.69
Amanda Nowak
published 3
2.67
Erin Chapman
published
2.65
Rebecca Davis
published
2.63
Mandy Pike
published
2.41
Reem Symons
published
Meghan Mannella
published
Noelle Siegel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Pike + Erin Chapman1446% games+4.2% vs expected
Mandy Pike + Paula Adcock224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie Scheer
85W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Mary Kroeger
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jessica Strack
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Paula Adcock
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Claudine Galt
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Michelle Pergler
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Marissa Woodruff
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Marika Czerwinski
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Erin Rauch
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amanda Nowak
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
Erin Chapman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Rebecca Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Mandy Pike
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Reem Symons
5W–29L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
Elisabeth Greiveldinger
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meghan Mannella
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Noelle Siegel
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.