Teams

The Real Housewives of Tennis

2023 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-30vs Baseline BabesWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Tomaszewski / Megan Sultan vs Hiam Eljazzar / Katie Plofchan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Niki Friedman vs Jennifer Leibold / DUSTY LOCKHART6-1, 6-3
2023-05-25vs Baseline BabesWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Collier / Leanne Drake vs Karen Pallotta / Katie Plofchan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristiane Lavin / Angela Tomaszewski vs Hiam Eljazzar / Karen McNeice6-1, 6-0
2023-05-23vs Baseline BabesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeanne Drake / Donna James vs Karyn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Furgal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStephanie Frauen vs Grace Kim3-6, 0-6
2023-05-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStephanie Frauen vs Grace Kim2-6, 2-6
2023-04-25vs Baseline BabesWon 10
W#3 DoublesGenevieve Gilinger / Anne McDonald vs Linda Chestnut / Ingabritt Dorame6-4, 6-2
2023-04-18vs Baseline BabesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Kaczmarek / Angela Tomaszewski vs Hiam Eljazzar / Karen McNeice2-6, 7-5
2023-04-11vs Baseline BabesWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Furgal / Donna James vs Marguerite McFadden / Abby Colucci7-5, 6-6
W#1 SinglesLeanne Drake vs Karyn DeVito6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnne McDonald / Stephanie Frauen vs Cheryl Phillips / Kristen Kilguss7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Lisa Furgal
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Megan Sultan
published
3.10
Angela Tomaszewski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Julie Collier
published
3.05
Stephanie Frauen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.05
Jennifer Graham
published
2.96
Lauren Malone
published
2.92
Donna James
published
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
2.89
Leanne Drake
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Anne McDonald
published 3
2.64
Genevieve Gilinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Furgal + Angela Tomaszewski8851% games+11.6% vs expected
Stephanie Frauen + Angela Tomaszewski2744% gamesnot enough data
Leanne Drake + Angela Tomaszewski4354% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Furgal + Stephanie Frauen134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Furgal + Leanne Drake123 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Drake + Stephanie Frauen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Furgal
204W–131L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Megan Sultan
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Angela Tomaszewski
111W–105L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
Julie Collier
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Stephanie Frauen
117W–162L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
Jennifer Graham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Lauren Malone
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.96
Donna James
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Leanne Drake
178W–263L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Anne McDonald
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Genevieve Gilinger
24W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.