Teams

Fitzgerald/LF

2025 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 3.5 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-04vs Hayes/ISLost 23
L#1 DoublesJulie Harrelson / Susan Hargis vs Madison Hayes / Hannah Birch2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLacey Vogts vs Eleanor Doyle4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSusie Anderson / Jody Fitzgerald vs Andrea Hayes / Barb Evans6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHarrison Elle Yarnell vs Ava Birch6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cantrell / Haven Willis vs Marcell Matthews / Jordan Berglund3-6, 2-6
2025-05-20vs Walker/GRWon 41
L#1 DoublesJulie Harrelson / Allie Utley vs Tracy Earls / Shannon Faulkner5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHarrison Elle Yarnell vs Eden Evans7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVicki Sue Loehrs / Karen Young vs Iqra Masood / Andrea Walker7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLacey Vogts vs Anna Quick6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusie Anderson / Jody Fitzgerald vs Barb Drotar / Betty Klein6-2, 6-4
2025-05-14vs Crockett/GRWon 50
W#1 DoublesVicki Sue Loehrs / Karen Young vs Lindsey Darbonne / Christina Peek6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLacey Vogts vs Kate G Green6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusie Anderson / Jody Fitzgerald vs Grace Doyle / Patty Steen6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAna Barros vs Jennifer Hamilton6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAdria Sanditen / Laura Vidal vs Jill Jmaeff / Louise Reilly6-2, 6-4
2025-05-05vs Coffey/PHWon 50
W#1 DoublesVicki Sue Loehrs / Karen Young vs Ginger Coffey / Jill Gulick4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHarrison Elle Yarnell vs Dana Burd6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAna Barros / Lori Hubbard vs Lisa Mitchell / Jessica Rice6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHaven Willis vs Valerie Cooper6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCorinne Johnson / Laura Vidal vs Lisa Charvat / Ginger Penn7-6, 6-2
2025-05-01vs Spencer/LFLost 23
W#1 DoublesAllie Utley / Lori Hubbard vs Traci Hazel / Traci Ladner6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesVicki Sue Loehrs vs Theresa Melega6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJody Fitzgerald / Susie Anderson vs Denise Riley / Kimberly KnifeChief6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAdria Sanditen vs Tricia Dailey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cantrell / Susan Hargis vs Peyton Pinkerton / Ruthie Pease4-6, 1-6
2025-04-22vs Green 2/Thompson/LFLost 23
L#1 DoublesHaven Willis / Julie Harrelson vs Alexis Hubble / Valerie Santiago6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesHarrison Elle Yarnell vs Lana Mnajjed2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCorinne Johnson / Adria Sanditen vs Yoko Elizondo / Marilyn Elizondo6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLacey Vogts vs Meagan Jacobs-Irwin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Hargis / Michelle Cantrell vs Mary Lamoreaux / Tulai Mnajjed0-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs Tulsa/Crowder/LFLost 14
L#1 DoublesVicki Sue Loehrs / Karen Young vs Megan Hubbard / Emilee Irby4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHarrison Elle Yarnell vs Ashley Daugherty1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Harrelson / Lori Hubbard vs Michelle Pryer / Megan Biram1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAllie Utley vs Serena Henderson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cantrell / Adria Sanditen vs Amy Slade / Aja Howerton2-6, 1-6
2025-04-01vs Sidorakis/SH 3.5WLost 23
L#1 DoublesKaren Young / Vicki Sue Loehrs vs Lindy Collins / Morgan Murry2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAllie Utley vs Hunter Sidorakis3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLori Hubbard / Ana Barros vs Michelle Evans / Patterson Rooney3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHaven Willis vs Felicity Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCorinne Johnson / Laura Vidal vs Adrienne Kleckner / Sarah McPhail6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tulsa/Crowder/LF7132820214
2Orange 1: Watling/SH 3.5W71291132323
3Phillips/LF62251537330
4Green 2/Thompson/LF62231738341
5Orange 2: Teague/GR62261438350
6Coffey/PH53231739326
7Sidorakis/SH 3.5W53241641323
8Duncan/TTC44192144360
9Hayes/IS44221844334
10Fitzgerald/LF35231740338
11Celestain/LF35192147353
12Mitchell/LF35182249354
13Grotts/IS35152552353
14Walker/GR17112961421
15Crockett/GR1773367437
16Lilly/LF0893167442

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Allie Utley
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 3.5
3.02
Lacey Vogts
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.98
Corinne Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Harrison Elle Yarnell
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.89
Ana Barros
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.85
Haven Willis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
2.79
Jody Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Laura Vidal
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Lori Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Adria Sanditen
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Susan Hargis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Vicki Sue Loehrs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.49
Julie Harrelson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Michelle Cantrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Karen Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Fitzgerald + Harrison Elle Yarnell5068% games+18.0% vs expected
Karen Young + Lori Hubbard4263% games+14.0% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Vicki Sue Loehrs5162% games+13.6% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Lori Hubbard3259% games+11.8% vs expected
Ana Barros + Lori Hubbard6060% games+11.4% vs expected
Vicki Sue Loehrs + Haven Willis7365% games+10.4% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Adria Sanditen4161% games+9.8% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Laura Vidal12563% games+9.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allie Utley
24W–30L career · 11 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Lacey Vogts
32W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.02
3.5
Corinne Johnson
135W–90L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Harrison Elle Yarnell
55W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3.5
Ana Barros
24W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Haven Willis
205W–107L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
Jody Fitzgerald
97W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
Laura Vidal
114W–58L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Lori Hubbard
63W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.74
3
Adria Sanditen
80W–75L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Susan Hargis
83W–103L career · 8 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Vicki Sue Loehrs
94W–72L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%27%73%
2.59
Julie Harrelson
56W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Michelle Cantrell
71W–83L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Karen Young
24W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.