Teams

Willow-Oaks Blackwood

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-24vs Westwood-HarkerWon 20
W#2 DoublesYancey Haas / Michael Chapman vs Sean DiBlasi / Meghan Dexter6-4, 6-5
W#3 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Lucia O'Connell vs Rene Philhower / Mike Philhower7-6, 5-2
2024-03-09vs SAL-ConsolvoWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Lucia O'Connell vs Dean Deaver / Julie Nobles6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-02vs ACAC-Larue 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Lucia O'Connell vs Denise Weisberg / Daniel Poole5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Chapman / Yancey Haas vs Stone Smith / Virginia Nelson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-02-24vs WO-Moehling 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYancey Haas / Michael Chapman vs James Rosenstock / Ginnie Price4-6, 1-6
2024-02-18vs MAC-TalamoLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Lucia O'Connell vs Erich Yost / Eleanor Gardner2-6, 3-6
2024-02-10vs ACAC-Civilette/HatcherWon 10
W#1 DoublesYancey Haas / Michael Chapman vs Ryan Traylor / Gail Cavallaro7-6, 2-3, 1-0
2024-02-04vs Burkwood-ColginWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Yancey Haas vs Joseph Golden / Priscilla Woody6-4, 6-0
2024-01-27vs CCV-Huffman/BrannanWon 10
W#1 DoublesYancey Haas / Michael Chapman vs Joseph Parker / Elizabeth Toohers7-5, 7-5
2024-01-14vs MTC-Crews MiraclesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDanny MacNelly / Lucia O'Connell vs Lewis Farinholt / Kathleen Laroche6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Yancey Haas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Lucia O'Connell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Mansi Shah
published
3.35
Terence Blackwood
published
3.33
Danny MacNelly
published 3.5
3.33
Michael Chapman
published
3.31
Jenny Norfleet
published
3.27
Stephen Mathews
published
3.15
Kelly Gregory
published
3.12
Brian Ford
published 3.5
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
3.02
Jeffrey Begin
published
2.83
Stacy Curtis
published
2.65
Beth Kelly
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yancey Haas
166W–100L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Lucia O'Connell
101W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Mansi Shah
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
Terence Blackwood
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Danny MacNelly
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Michael Chapman
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Jenny Norfleet
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Stephen Mathews
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Brian Ford
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jeffrey Begin
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Kelly
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.