Teams

Woodside - Day

2026 CSRATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring '26 · Women 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-11vs Odell Weeks - DeHartLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatie Tate / Helen Faulk vs Susie Kneece / Jennifer Myers0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKristen Burns vs Kimberly Trapp6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Jordan / Tracey Carroll vs Laura Hall / Kim Cooper6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCaroline Day / Lindsay Robinson vs Sharon DeHart / Melissa Bunney4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#4 DoublesPaige Tiffany / Vickie Brown vs AUDREY OSTEEN / Angie Osbon3-6, 6-7
2026-03-07vs West Lake - HendrixWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Day / Lindsay Robinson vs Holly Hendrix / Kari Jones6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesHelen Faulk vs Mary Ann Scraper6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPaige Tiffany / Katie Tate vs Diane Smith / Pamela Lee3-6, 4-6
2026-03-03vs NTC - DowdeyWon 21
L#1 DoublesCaroline Day / Lindsay Robinson vs Sandra Dowdey / Erika Pracht6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Schweizer / Claire Cunningham vs Erica Pratt / Jena Puckett6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Pettigrew / Mercedes Kucyk vs Roxy Trice / Sharon Kendrick4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-17vs NTC - ParhamLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Day / Mercedes Kucyk vs Connie Richards / Mary Leonard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClaire Cunningham vs Pam Callaway2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVickie Brown / Michelle Schweizer vs Patty Hood / Kim White4-6, 5-7
2026-02-10vs Odell Weeks - CashLost 14
W#1 DoublesCaroline Day / Lindsay Robinson vs Valerie Parks / Melissa Pflum6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKristen Burns vs Laurie Chase3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTracey Carroll / Susan Jordan vs Lauren Duckworth / Lisa Durstin3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Tiffany / Mercedes Kucyk vs Kari DeLoach / PAT SEWELL1-4
L#4 DoublesMary Pettigrew / Desiree Voegele vs Donna Kennaday / Tina Vogl1-6, 1-6
2026-01-20vs NTC - BaldyLost 12
W#1 DoublesHelen Faulk / Caroline Day vs Lyndi Baldy / Alexis Shaefer6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesClaire Cunningham vs Nichelle Protho2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMercedes Kucyk / Katie Tate vs Melisa DeAngel / Kristen Williams6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Odell Weeks - Cash6026412152
2Odell Weeks - DeHart5121923234
3NTC - Baldy42181228227
4Woodside - Day24111941278
5NTC - Dowdey2482246294
6West Lake - Hendrix15121840283
7NTC - Parham1582247306

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kristen Burns
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Desiree Voegele
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Helen Faulk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.69
Lindsay Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Vickie Brown
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Michelle Schweizer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Katie Tate
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
2.59
Claire Cunningham
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.58
Mercedes Kucyk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Paige Tiffany
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Susan Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Mary Pettigrew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Tracey Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vickie Brown + Paige Tiffany123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Schweizer + Paige Tiffany123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Burns
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Desiree Voegele
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Helen Faulk
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Lindsay Robinson
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
Vickie Brown
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Michelle Schweizer
28W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Katie Tate
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
Melissa Lackey-Oremus
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
Claire Cunningham
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
Mercedes Kucyk
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58
Paige Tiffany
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Susan Jordan
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Mary Pettigrew
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Tracey Carroll
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.