Teams

AR/Richard/LR

2024 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-27vs AZ/BryanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Boyd / Harry Leasure vs Earl Backman / Mike Heusinkveld4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDalton Coleman / Mike Lee vs Joe Ricci / Michael Walls4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Fisher / Anthony Kovacevic vs Wayne Hall / Joseph Hook6-7, 4-6
2024-04-26vs TN/ThompsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnthony Kovacevic / Michael Fisher vs Richard Tillison / John Lovell6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Lee / Dalton Coleman vs T Thompson / Mike Canada0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHarry Leasure / Freddie Hubach vs Gary Irwin / Dave Dameron2-6, 2-6
2024-04-26vs AL/McFarlingLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnthony Kovacevic / Terry Richard vs Ronnie McFarling / Larry Sewell2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Fisher / Harry Leasure vs Robert Anderson / Stephen Kee0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFreddie Hubach / Donald Miller vs Dennis Reasner / Mickey Tidmore4-6, 0-6
2024-04-25vs OK/ALL TENNIS/LangwellLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Fisher / Terry Richard vs Dennis Morris / Mark Milligan5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Kovacevic / Dalton Coleman vs Thomas Lydy / Chris Ferris3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonald Miller / Freddie Hubach vs Tom Langwell / Robin Dean6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AL/McFarling40111353
2MS/GC Byrd4093889
3AZ/Bryan31102790
4TN/Thompson31841299
5OK/ALL TENNIS/Langwell316613114
6AR/Holmes/Norby/HSV1321021126
7LA/Bossier Ballers/Boyd043919125
8TN/Howell/Memphis043921134
9AR/Richard/LR0421021139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Anthony Kovacevic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Harry Leasure
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Terry Richard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Michael Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Dalton Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Freddie Hubach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Boyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Richard + Anthony Kovacevic3255% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anthony Kovacevic
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Harry Leasure
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Richard
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Michael Fisher
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.83
Dalton Coleman
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Freddie Hubach
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Boyd
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.