Teams

SNakai (Blakeney)

2022 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-24vs SWhitney (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 SinglesDipti Jagannath vs Anne Lynn4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-18vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesSanami Nakai vs Lea Powell0-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesJill Griset vs Laura Difraia2-6, 1-6
2022-07-11vs DMusante (Matthews)Won 10
W#3 SinglesSanami Nakai vs Julie Linder6-2, 6-2
2022-06-29vs MJones (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 SinglesDipti Jagannath vs April Porter4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDipti Jagannath vs Maggie Wheeler3-6, 4-6
2022-06-13Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJill Griset vs Caroline Sjogren2-6, 5-7
2022-06-06vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSanami Nakai vs Angie Michaud6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMichelle Ludwiczak vs Beth Hahn7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Women - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Michelle Ludwiczak
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Dipti Jagannath
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Sanami Nakai
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Wendy Rossi
published
3.12
Jill Griset
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Rosalie ORourke
published
3.02
DAYA RANJALKAR
published 3
2.75
Dawn Houpt
published 3
Neha Bhalla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sanami Nakai + Dipti Jagannath7849% games−2.5% vs expected
Sanami Nakai + Jill Griset3253% gamesnot enough data
Sanami Nakai + Wendy Rossi123 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Rossi + Rosalie ORourke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Ludwiczak
92W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dipti Jagannath
155W–104L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Sanami Nakai
118W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Wendy Rossi
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jill Griset
32W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Rosalie ORourke
16W–26L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
DAYA RANJALKAR
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Dawn Houpt
32W–26L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Neha Bhalla
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.