Teams

FTAFF/Riverside/Allen

FTA Fun Fall 18 and 40 & Over Fun Doubles - Sundays · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-08vs FTAFF/Sportsclub/HaglerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJustine Allen / Edie Clator vs Andrea Johnson / Katia Wehrly7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarol McCoy / Suzanne Spotts vs Jeanna Chambers / Katie Jones7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrittany Fowler / Laura Carlson vs Brooke Miller / Allison Easterby0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-24vs FTAFF/GCC/HillLost 12
W#1 DoublesJustine Allen / Edie Clator vs Amy Greer / Tracy O'Shea6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrittany Fowler / Carol McCoy vs Ali Hill / Karen Culumovic4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJody Rofelson / Julia Mullen vs Melissa Richardson / Drake Gribbin4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-11-03vs FTAFF/SugarCreek/FarmerLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Carlson / Brittany Fowler vs Meredith Johnson / Jennifer Nessmith6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Cristina Koehler
published 4
3.52
Edie Clator
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Liz Darrow
published
3.29
Justine Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Carol McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brittany Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Elizabeth Hood
published 3
Jody Rofelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edie Clator + Cristina Koehler6556% games+9.4% vs expected
Justine Allen + Edie Clator9355% games−2.9% vs expected
Liz Darrow + Edie Clator3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cristina Koehler
45W–24L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Edie Clator
46W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Liz Darrow
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Justine Allen
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Carol McCoy
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Brittany Fowler
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Hood
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Jody Rofelson
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.