Teams

Baucom

2026 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 3.0 Mens

13 players · average NTRP 2.92 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-19vs Ballou/McNeilLost 14
L#1 DoublesPatrick Griffin / Dylan Otts vs Jin Lee / Lukas Debolt7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJr Norton vs Lee Rutter5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDan Odom / Colton Street vs Beau Mcneill / Brent Leslie6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDustin Baucom vs Mark Smith6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJosh Cobb / Garrett Jenkins vs Cody White / Jerrod Martin0-6, 1-6
2026-05-13vs PermenterLost 04
L#1 DoublesJr Norton / Patrick Griffin vs Thad Reid / Adam Pardue2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesColton Street vs Sagnik Singha0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Bryant / Garrett Jenkins vs Kelly Addington / Ryan Wulfjen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Manning / Josh Cobb vs Lance Permenter / Oscar Grimaldo2-6, 3-6
2026-05-05vs PermenterWon 32
L#1 DoublesJr Norton / Stephen Manning vs Thad Reid / Ryan Wulfjen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTyler Graham vs Oscar Grimaldo4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNathan Bryant / Garrett Jenkins vs Lance Permenter / Mike Welch7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDustin Baucom vs Ibrahima Yade4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJosh Cobb / Jacob Burt vs Dennis Launarey / Gregory Cook7-5, 6-0
2026-04-21vs Ballou/McNeilLost 14
W#1 DoublesJr Norton / Patrick Griffin vs Beau Mcneill / Brent Leslie7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTyler Graham vs Lee Rutter0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Manning / Dylan Otts vs Jin Lee / Jerrod Martin5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDustin Baucom vs Hector Martin Palacio6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacob Burt / Nathan Bryant vs Michael Ballou / Lukas Debolt2-6, 1-6
2026-04-07vs Ballou/McNeilLost 14
L#1 DoublesStephen Shewmake / Dylan Otts vs Mark Smith / Brent Leslie4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTyler Graham vs Lee Rutter3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesColton Street / Josh Cobb vs Michael Ballou / Jin Lee0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDustin Baucom vs Hector Martin Palacio6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNathan Bryant / Garrett Jenkins vs Beau Mcneill / Kaden Marshall1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-31vs PermenterLost 14
L#1 DoublesStephen Manning / Stephen Shewmake vs Oscar Grimaldo / Adam Pardue4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJr Norton vs Russell Weng1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Graham / Nathan Bryant vs Ibrahima Yade / Mike Welch6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDylan Otts vs Michael Zaragoza1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGarrett Jenkins / Josh Cobb vs Sagnik Singha / Dennis Launarey1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Mens
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Permenter51201024232
2Baucom1572351332

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Stephen Manning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Stephen Shewmake
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.93
Dustin Baucom
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Dan Odom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Nathan Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.74
Patrick Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Tyler Graham
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Jr Norton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.61
Jacob Burt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Dylan Otts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Josh Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.52
Colton Street
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.13
Garrett Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Bryant + Garrett Jenkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Manning
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Stephen Shewmake
5W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Dustin Baucom
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Dan Odom
3W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Nathan Bryant
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Patrick Griffin
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Tyler Graham
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Jr Norton
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Jacob Burt
2W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Dylan Otts
0W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Josh Cobb
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Colton Street
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Garrett Jenkins
3W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.