Teams

WI Combo 6.5W GML Malone Park Hendrix

2025 WI Combo · WI Combo 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Natalie Hendrix vs Stephanie Jansen / Cathy Rozewicz5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrigitte Potter / MacKenzie Snow vs Janice Gardetto / Kate McKenzie6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoyce Casey / Michelle Knudten vs Karen Moran / Jennifer Williams6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesBrigitte Potter / Cassidy Rice vs Lisa Leggett / Jona Lestan6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBethany Girardi / Kristi Luzar vs Julie Limberg / Gail Thorpe6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Knudten / MacKenzie Snow vs Diane Bretl / Joyce Kunath6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Natalie Hendrix vs Linda Curtis / Andrea Pipito2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrigitte Potter / MacKenzie Snow vs Mindy Harmelink / Wendy Cartwright0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBethany Girardi / Joyce Casey vs Sarah Evans / Mary Lynn Nowak7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Natalie Hendrix vs Mindy Harmelink / Wendy Cartwright6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBethany Girardi / Cassidy Rice vs Sarah Evans / Andrea Pipito6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Knudten / MacKenzie Snow vs Patrice Michaels / Mary Lynn Nowak6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBrigitte Potter / Natalie Hendrix vs Stacy Blattner / Jane Mlenar6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBethany Girardi / Cassidy Rice vs Elizabeth Ferchoff / Monica Thomas6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristi Luzar / Michelle Knudten vs Anja Beckmann / Shelley Burns6-3, 6-1
2025-09-09vs WI Combo 6.5MX GML FLAC BusateriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Natalie Hendrix vs Beth Ivey / Amy Pulokas6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSilvia Zapien / Joyce Casey vs Andrea Gromacki / Joy Asta1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesBrigitte Potter / Cassidy Rice vs Janice Gardetto / Stephanie Jansen6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBethany Girardi / Joyce Casey vs Kate McKenzie / Jennifer Williams6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSilvia Zapien / Barb Gilmore vs Karen Moran / Erin Dummert6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesBrigitte Potter / Natalie Hendrix vs Lisa Leggett / Jona Lestan4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMacKenzie Snow / Gabrielle Hendrix vs Julie Limberg / Gail Thorpe2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSilvia Zapien / Kristi Luzar vs Sharon Webb / Arlene Adams6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Brigitte Potter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Silvia Zapien
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Gabrielle Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Bethany Girardi
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Natalie Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Michelle Knudten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Joyce Casey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cassidy Rice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Barb Gilmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Kristi Luzar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
MacKenzie Snow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brigitte Potter + Gabrielle Hendrix15556% games+1.5% vs expected
Natalie Hendrix + Gabrielle Hendrix5945% games+1.3% vs expected
Bethany Girardi + Gabrielle Hendrix10253% games−3.1% vs expected
Silvia Zapien + Michelle Knudten0629% gamesnot enough data
Brigitte Potter + Natalie Hendrix4161% gamesnot enough data
Silvia Zapien + Natalie Hendrix3243% gamesnot enough data
Bethany Girardi + Kristi Luzar033 matchesnot enough data
Bethany Girardi + Cassidy Rice213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brigitte Potter
40W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Silvia Zapien
46W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Gabrielle Hendrix
84W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Bethany Girardi
41W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Natalie Hendrix
30W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Michelle Knudten
19W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Joyce Casey
62W–113L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cassidy Rice
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Barb Gilmore
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Kristi Luzar
20W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
MacKenzie Snow
18W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.