Teams

SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Faltico

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Men - 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-19vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ RundeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Robert Meader vs Nick Runde / Melvin Pascoguin6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRandall Bolelli / Mike Hasan vs Michael Seelinger / Rafael Salinas7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-06-12vs SD 3.5 University City RC/ ChinWon 21
W#1 DoublesVijay Desiraju / Jeffrey Russell vs Christopher Lock / Keith Chin6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRobert Meader vs Peter Andersen2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRandall Bolelli / Scott Trulove vs Chris Chessman / Daniel Gant4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-30vs SD 3.5 La Jolla TC/ WattonLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Witt / Randall Bolelli vs Tyler Haire / Prashanth Vijayaraghavan2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-22vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ KamasLost 02
L#1 DoublesVijay Desiraju / Russell Austin vs John Torres / Sig Kupka5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMichael Faltico vs Edgar Lopez3-6, 4-6
2022-05-15vs SD 3.5 University City RC/ ChinWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Jeffrey Russell vs Chris Chessman / Daniel Gant6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesVijay Desiraju vs Peter Andersen7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Trulove / Robert Meader vs Chris Anthes / Keith Chin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesVijay Desiraju / Russell Austin vs Tom Damore / Peter Wilkinson6-2, 6-3
2022-05-01vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ RundeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Jeffrey Russell vs Benjamin Malonzo / Matthew Flores6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMike Hasan / Randall Bolelli vs Reginald Blue / Michael Seelinger3-6, 0-6
2022-04-10vs SD 3.5 Tierrasanta TC/ AnnobilSplit 11
L#1 SinglesVijay Desiraju vs Safa Guner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Trulove / Michael Faltico vs George Annobil / Aaron Kroll6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Vijay Desiraju
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Russell Austin
published
3.52
Jeffrey Russell
published
3.48
Michael Faltico
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Randall Bolelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Robert Meader
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Scott Trulove
published
William Witt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vijay Desiraju
50W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Russell Austin
16W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Jeffrey Russell
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.52
3.5
Michael Faltico
46W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Randall Bolelli
45W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Robert Meader
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Scott Trulove
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
William Witt
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.