Teams

24 MAC Chronis

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-04vs 17 Salisbury AppelbeeWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmadeus Malheiros / Travis Fand vs Steve Quattlebaum / Harold Thornton5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-13vs 13 Richmond Country Club HevronWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / John Rogers vs Patrick Riendeau / Paul Manno6-1, 6-1
2023-05-06vs 21 Willow Oaks FranksLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmadeus Malheiros / Lawrence Golixer vs Chris Price / Trent McFadden2-6, 1-6
2023-04-23vs 7 Westwood Lemco WhalersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Lance Pessarra vs Lonnie Lemco / Cabell Doyle6-4, 6-2
2023-04-02vs 3 Westwood Ringberg/WestWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Lance Pessarra vs Stan Craig / Joseph Jones6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jeremy Calbreath
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Jason Yost
published
2.96
Ariel Mejia
published 3
2.92
Sacha Shaygan
published
2.85
Lance Pessarra
published
2.84
Paul Haynes
published
2.84
Aditya Chavan
published 3
2.84
Todd Manning
published
2.77
Amadeus Malheiros
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Morris White
published
2.59
John Rogers
published
2.57
Mark Chronis
published
2.54
Lawrence Golixer
published
2.32
James Temple
published 3
Patrick Clapp
published
Ralph Novak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Haynes + Mark Chronis224 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Calbreath + Ariel Mejia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeremy Calbreath
164W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jason Yost
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Ariel Mejia
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Sacha Shaygan
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lance Pessarra
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Paul Haynes
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Aditya Chavan
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
Todd Manning
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Amadeus Malheiros
111W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Morris White
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.62
John Rogers
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
2.59
Mark Chronis
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Lawrence Golixer
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%38%62%
2.54
3
James Temple
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.32
Patrick Clapp
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ralph Novak
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.