Teams

MERVYN MORRIS PK 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Christina Kuo
published 3.5
3.16
Pearl Leung
published
3.13
Anna Bowe
published 3
3.12
Lauren Fong
published
3.03
MELISSA de CASTRO
published
3.00
Gnaumie-Monique Valle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Stephanie Wendell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Kasey Chung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Gloria Sue
published
2.93
Linda Duchscherer
published
2.86
Penny Lane
published
2.85
Juliet Boss
published
2.84
2.84
Amanda Sawit
published 3
2.68
Manuela Robinson
published
2.67
Jackelyne Ferreira
published
2.59
Leann Kanowsky
published
2.57
Katherine Greenberg
published
2.46
Olivia Mattox
published
2.41
Gunnel Nyberg
published
Lizette Kyman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Sue + Linda Duchscherer5353% games−0.5% vs expected
Leann Kanowsky + Penny Lane2348% gamesnot enough data
Manuela Robinson + Leann Kanowsky134 matchesnot enough data
Olivia Mattox + Katherine Greenberg134 matchesnot enough data
Anna Bowe + Penny Lane404 matchesnot enough data
Jackelyne Ferreira + MELISSA de CASTRO224 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Sue + Alexandra Seibert123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Trinidad + Manuela Robinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Kuo
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Pearl Leung
38W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Anna Bowe
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Lauren Fong
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
MELISSA de CASTRO
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Gnaumie-Monique Valle
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Stephanie Wendell
28W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kasey Chung
34W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Gloria Sue
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Linda Duchscherer
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Penny Lane
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.86
Juliet Boss
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Alexandra Seibert
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Amanda Sawit
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Manuela Robinson
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
Jackelyne Ferreira
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
Leann Kanowsky
16W–31L career · no lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Katherine Greenberg
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Olivia Mattox
14W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
3
Catherine Trinidad
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Gunnel Nyberg
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lizette Kyman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.