Teams

HW BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-23vs CACM PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesRandy Eidler / Jennifer Marlowe vs Mary Beth Church / Helen Wilson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeredith van Wyk / Daniele Dattilo vs Juli Bulloch / Kathy Bailey7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCorby McGrath / Carol Decker vs Caren Misky / Lisa Snider6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-13vs GCC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Decker / Corby McGrath vs Brooke Beasley / Amy Reilly6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Marlowe / Sophia Burke vs Andrea Carrington / Merry Logan7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniele Dattilo / Meredith van Wyk vs Katie Kline / Julie Buckley6-0, 6-3
2023-07-09vs SS-H GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJill Smith / Randy Eidler vs Cheryl Sanders / Holly Payne6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRhonda Patston vs Debbie Maloney5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Decker / Corby McGrath vs Vickie Conroy / Tracy Pursell6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesStephanie Luther / Leslie Cutter vs Cheryl Perez / Chris Thulin6-1, 7-5
2023-07-06vs SS-G REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniele Dattilo / Sophia Burke vs Becca Damiano / Angela Miller3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Eidler / Stephanie Luther vs Lori Manzer / Kim Byers1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Cutter / Rhonda Patston vs Karissa Savage / Lynne Paris7-5, 7-6
2023-06-22vs GAC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Decker / Randy Eidler vs Debra Benge / Ann Baer5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith van Wyk / Jill Smith vs Katie Sznewajs / Maureen Roskoski6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniele Dattilo / Leslie Cutter vs Tracy Powers / Tricia Wright6-2, 6-4
2023-06-16vs ATC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesMeredith van Wyk / Randy Eidler vs Debbie Rinehart / Riisa Dikeou2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRhonda Patston vs Jessica Davis3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Cutter / Jennifer Marlowe vs Caroline Rassenfoss / Jackie Brown-Griggs6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Luther / Christy Serenyi vs Laurie MacDowell / Charlotte Petersen3-6, 3-6
2023-06-08vs LTFC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarol Decker / Jennifer Marlowe vs Rebecca Franciscus / Lindsay Piepgras6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRhonda Patston vs Theresa Gilpatrick6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCorby McGrath / Sophia Burke vs Shelley Chism / Linda Murray2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Serenyi / Daniele Dattilo vs Margaret Fuller / Elaine Mariner5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Daniele Dattilo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Carol Decker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Corby McGrath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Jill Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Jennifer Marlowe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Meredith van Wyk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Rhonda Patston
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Stephanie Luther
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Christy Serenyi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Randy Eidler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Sophia Burke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Leslie Cutter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Marlowe + Stephanie Luther11260% games+8.8% vs expected
Jill Smith + Daniele Dattilo12364% games+8.4% vs expected
Meredith van Wyk + Jill Smith13661% games+7.8% vs expected
Corby McGrath + Jennifer Marlowe7657% games+7.6% vs expected
Rhonda Patston + Corby McGrath8257% games+7.3% vs expected
Randy Eidler + Jill Smith5457% games+7.0% vs expected
Rhonda Patston + Randy Eidler6556% games+3.9% vs expected
Carol Decker + Corby McGrath11557% games+3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniele Dattilo
86W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Carol Decker
49W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Corby McGrath
82W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Jill Smith
50W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennifer Marlowe
40W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Meredith van Wyk
74W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Rhonda Patston
110W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Stephanie Luther
45W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Christy Serenyi
30W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Randy Eidler
109W–103L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Sophia Burke
51W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Leslie Cutter
63W–93L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.