Teams

Brookhaven/Cheyney-Goble W3.0S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

19 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-02vs Prestonwood/Sander-Walters W3.0SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJackie Albers vs Erica Sander6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShelli Cheyney / Pam Weber vs Alicia Andry / BARBIE BOE6-4, 7-6
2025-10-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Goble / Kellie Morrison vs Amanda Peoples / Christi Young2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTeresa Chan-Leveno / Tiffany Chen vs Karen Kim / Kerrin Nally6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-05vs High Point/Benso W3.0SLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Dendinger / Julia Price vs YAN SHI / Bethany Bennett3-6, 2-6
2025-09-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJackie Albers / Tiffany Chen vs Margrit Bazan / Gerilynn Sanders2-6, 3-6
2025-09-21vs Canyon Creek/Abernethy W3.0SSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaria Goble / Kellie Morrison vs Lisa Adams-Gibbons / Kesler Manning1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJackie Albers vs Amy Castro6-3, 6-4
2025-09-14vs Gleneagles/Anderson-Cannon W3.0SWon 10
W#1 DoublesJackie Albers / Teresa Chan-Leveno vs Elsa Burg / Jenna Maynard5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-07vs LB Houston/O'Brien W3.0SLost 04
L#1 DoublesJackie Albers / Carrie Pope vs Kim Houlne / Jennifer Mays0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Dendinger vs Laura Evans4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelli Cheyney / Kellie Morrison vs Dawn Goodrich / Tricia Plumb1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate Lee / Pam Weber vs Merry Dimanh / Michelle Miller3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Sarah Tchoukaleff
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Michele Lesslie
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Diana Wohldmann
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.02
Heather Smercina
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.87
Maria Goble
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Jennifer Gladstone
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Jessica Kirwan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Jackie Albers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.80
Teresa Chan-Leveno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Susan Dendinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.77
Meagan Martinelli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Dionne Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Pam Weber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Julia Price
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Barbara Milhizer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Shelli Cheyney
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.40
Carrie Pope
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.39
Kellie Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Brueningsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Smercina + Michele Lesslie3456% games+16.3% vs expected
Meagan Martinelli + Jennifer Gladstone5358% games+8.6% vs expected
Heather Smercina + Maria Goble2350% games+7.3% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Dionne Flynn51045% games+5.2% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Heather Smercina5454% games+4.7% vs expected
Shelli Cheyney + Pam Weber4341% games−0.6% vs expected
Shelli Cheyney + Carrie Pope2639% games−1.2% vs expected
Kellie Morrison + Maria Goble2542% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Tchoukaleff
29W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
Michele Lesslie
24W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Diana Wohldmann
27W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Heather Smercina
34W–36L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Maria Goble
15W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
Jennifer Gladstone
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Jessica Kirwan
20W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Jackie Albers
19W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.81
Teresa Chan-Leveno
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Susan Dendinger
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Meagan Martinelli
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dionne Flynn
13W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Pam Weber
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Julia Price
10W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Barbara Milhizer
7W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Shelli Cheyney
14W–42L career · 12 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Carrie Pope
16W–33L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.40
Kellie Morrison
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.39
Melissa Brueningsen
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.