Teams

LTFCS HERZINGER

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-16vs CSCC LOWESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Brenda Herzinger vs Ben Lowe / Mary Evilsizer6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Straub / Alohalani Kaleo vs Larry Liston / Sally Martin6-1, 6-2
2021-05-09vs FLYHS SAXBYWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrenda Herzinger / David Clipsham vs Amy Saxby / Ryan Saxby5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-25vs LTFCS VANDEVEERWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Brenda Herzinger vs Trent Glaser / Tracy Glaser6-3, 7-6
2021-04-18vs CCW YOUNGLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Brenda Herzinger vs Tracy Slater / John Whipple6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-04-11vs CSCC LOWELost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Straub / Alohalani Kaleo vs Grayson Graham / Mia Kardell3-6, 6-7
2021-04-04vs FLYHS SAXBYWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Clipsham / Kelly Cavanaugh vs Amy Saxby / Ryan Saxby6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Straub / Alohalani Kaleo vs Chelsey Wright / Kevin Wright6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kelly Cavanaugh
published
3.45
David Clipsham
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Alohalani Kaleo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brenda Herzinger
published 3.5
3.25
Chris Straub
published 3.5
3.19
Lisa Bischoff
published
3.18
Cederick Dark
published 3.5
2.88
Neal Siegel
published
Diane Stewart
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Bischoff + Cederick Dark3345% games−1.9% vs expected
Kelly Cavanaugh + David Clipsham8652% games−4.5% vs expected
Alohalani Kaleo + David Clipsham9750% games−5.4% vs expected
Kelly Cavanaugh + Chris Straub123 matchesnot enough data
Alohalani Kaleo + Chris Straub123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Cavanaugh
78W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
David Clipsham
199W–91L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Alohalani Kaleo
129W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Brenda Herzinger
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Chris Straub
36W–30L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Bischoff
27W–27L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cederick Dark
45W–35L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Neal Siegel
17W–36L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Diane Stewart
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.