Teams

Whitall

2021 Montgomery Combo Winter · Combo Men 8.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMiguel Rufino / Brent Kendall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-03-13vs KleinWon 20
W#2 DoublesTzuhsiu Chiou / Bengt Liljas vs Andrew Currie / Larry Dechter6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Battalia / Juan Jose Tijero vs Mike Metzger / Barry Dickman6-3, 6-4
2021-02-24vs FoxLost 01
L#3 DoublesBengt Liljas / Miguel Rufino vs Steven Manning / Christopher Bragale7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-02-06vs KleinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGytis Kanchas / Bengt Liljas vs Dan Kotz / Andrew Currie1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTzuhsiu Chiou / Brent Kendall vs Christopher Apo / Bryan Kay6-3, 6-2
2021-01-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Jonathan Rivera vs John Doe / John Harrington4-6, 1-6
2021-01-17vs FoxLost 02
L#1 DoublesDerek Ireland / Brent Kendall vs Jeffrey Ocker / Corey Glocker2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Whitall / Miguel Rufino vs Robert Weaver / Fatih Selekler4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Barry Weiner
published 4.5
4.00
Derek Ireland
published 4.5
3.91
Brent Kendall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Bengt Liljas
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Juan Jose Tijero
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Jonathan Rivera
published
3.66
Trevor Lessard
published
3.59
David Whitall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Paul Brennan
published
3.45
William Wong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bengt Liljas + Brent Kendall7652% games−11.9% vs expected
Brent Kendall + David Whitall3251% gamesnot enough data
Bengt Liljas + David Whitall224 matchesnot enough data
Derek Ireland + David Whitall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barry Weiner
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Derek Ireland
89W–146L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Brent Kendall
184W–123L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Bengt Liljas
128W–99L career · 10 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Juan Jose Tijero
606W–366L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Jonathan Rivera
17W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Trevor Lessard
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
David Whitall
78W–80L career · 2 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Paul Brennan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
William Wong
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.