Teams

St.Luther40C8.5

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-09vs Be.Copeland40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Fran Ange vs Danielle Wilder / Kristal Nelson0-6, 1-6
2023-10-05vs Be.Copeland40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Stephanie Luther vs Kristal Nelson / Erin Rankin2-6, 6-7
2023-10-02vs Ch.Higgins40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Fran Ange vs Rachel Davis / Sandy Wood2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-09-18vs Be.Copeland40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesFran Ange / Carol Muth vs Erin Rankin / Terry Dale0-6, 2-6
2023-09-11vs Ch.Higgins40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Muth / Fran Ange vs Nannette Goodwin / Mary Prabel2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs Be.Copeland40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Susan King vs Danielle Wilder / Emily Culbreth0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Muth / Fran Ange vs Laura Hiller / Mary Money4-6, 4-6
2023-08-14vs Ch.Higgins40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Susan King vs Chunhui Higgins / Aileen Carroll2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesFran Ange / Stephanie Luther vs Sandy Wood / Christina Loaiza3-6, 3-6
2023-07-18vs Ch.Higgins40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Susan King vs Rachel Davis / Sandy Wood3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFran Ange / Carol Muth vs Nannette Goodwin / Mary Prabel2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Juli Korsnack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Cindy Faltisco
published 4
3.60
Carol Muth
published 4
3.41
Sherrie Lefere
published
3.28
Fran Ange
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Korri Styers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Ange + Juli Korsnack044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Juli Korsnack
99W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Cindy Faltisco
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Carol Muth
8W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Sherrie Lefere
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Fran Ange
74W–100L career · 12 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Korri Styers
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.